Rational inattention and the monotone likelihood ratio property

被引:2
作者
Mensch, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
Rational inattention; Information acquisition; Monotone likelihood ratio property; Increasing differences; PURE-STRATEGY EQUILIBRIA; INFORMATION ACQUISITION; GAMES; EXISTENCE; THEOREMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jet.2021.105284
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the connection between rational inattention and the monotone likelihood ratio prop-erty (MLRP). In many economic problems, agents prefer to take a higher action when there is a higher underlying state. It is often assumed that these agents have noisy signals that are strongly correlated with the underlying state, i.e. ordered by the MLRP. Separately, a large literature has recently explored the be-havior of rationally inattentive agents. Under some common separability and smoothness assumptions on the class of attention costs, I show that agents will always acquire signals that are ordered by the MLRP within such economic problems if and only if they have attention costs proportional to entropy reduction. With any other attention costs, agents err regarding the relative benefit of actions at different states. Ex-tending to games, I provide conditions under which players first acquire MLRP-ordered signals, and then choose higher actions given higher signals. I then apply these results to independent private-value auctions. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Single crossing properties and the existence of pure strategy equilibria in games of incomplete information
    Athey, S
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2001, 69 (04) : 861 - 889
  • [2] Information acquisition and efficient mechanism design
    Bergemann, D
    Välimäki, J
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (03) : 1007 - 1033
  • [3] Blackwell D., 1951, P 2 BERKELEY S MATH, P93
  • [4] Entropy and the Value of Information for Investors
    Cabrales, Antonio
    Gossner, Olivier
    Serrano, Roberto
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) : 360 - 377
  • [5] Caplin A., 2019, RATIONALLY INATTENTI
  • [6] Caplin A., 2013, BEHAV IMPLICATIONS R
  • [7] Revealed Preference, Rational Inattention, and Costly Information Acquisition
    Caplin, Andrew
    Dean, Mark
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (07) : 2183 - 2203
  • [8] GLOBAL GAMES AND EQUILIBRIUM SELECTION
    CARLSSON, H
    VANDAMME, E
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1993, 61 (05) : 989 - 1018
  • [9] de Oliveira H., 2014, Technical report
  • [10] Rationally inattentive preferences and hidden information costs
    De Oliveira, Henrique
    Denti, Tommaso
    Mihm, Maximilian
    Ozbek, Kemal
    [J]. THEORETICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 12 (02): : 621 - 654