Evaluating Rates and Application Timings of Saflufenacil for Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadenis) Prior to Planting No-Till Cotton

被引:22
作者
Owen, Lucas N. [1 ]
Mueller, Thomas C. [2 ]
Main, Christopher L. [1 ]
Bond, Jason
Steckel, Lawrence E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Plant Sci, W Tennessee Res & Educ Ctr, Jackson, TN 38301 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Plant Sci, Knoxville, TN 37920 USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Delta Res & Extens Ctr, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA
关键词
Herbicide; preemergence; preseeding burn-off; protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitor; GOSSYPIUM-HIRSUTUM; GLUFOSINATE;
D O I
10.1614/WT-D-10-00054.1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Managing glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed in no-till cotton continues to be a serious challenge for midsouthern producers. Field studies were conducted in 2008 and 2009 to evaluate spring burndown applications of saflufenacil on GR horseweed prior to planting cotton. Saflufenacil controlled GR horseweed at least 94% up to 7 d before planting (DBP) without causing significant cotton injury. Saflufenacil applied at 7 or 14 DBP controlled GR horseweed while still providing residual control until planting. Moreover, saflufenacil, on silt loam soil evaluated in this study, showed no more injury than dicamba applied 7 or more DBP. Results indicated that saflufenacil is an option in cotton for controlling GR horseweed much closer to cotton planting than 42 DBP (current saflufenacil label). At 25 g ha(-1), which is the standard labeled rate in cotton, saflufenacil provided > 90% control of GR horseweed. Saflufenacil as a GR horseweed burndown, could replace the current dicamba standard every other year to reduce the probability of horseweed developing resistance to dicamba or salflufenacil.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   THE INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE-HUMIDITY ON THE EFFICACY OF GLUFOSINATE-AMMONIUM [J].
ANDERSON, DM ;
SWANTON, CJ ;
HALL, JC ;
MERSEY, BG .
WEED RESEARCH, 1993, 33 (02) :139-147
[2]   INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE ON HORSEWEED, CONYZA-CANADENSIS [J].
BROWN, SM ;
WHITWELL, T .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 2 (03) :269-270
[3]  
CARMER SG, 1989, AGRON J, V81, P655
[4]  
Gleason HenryA., 1963, MANUAL VASCULAR PLAN
[5]  
Heap I., 2008, INT SURVEY HERBICIDE
[6]   Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Mississippi [J].
Koger, CH ;
Poston, DH ;
Hayes, RM ;
Montgomery, RE .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) :820-825
[7]  
Liebl R.A., 2008, BAS 800H NEW HERBICI, V48, P120
[8]   Biotic and abiotic factors influence horseweed emergence [J].
Main, Christopher L. ;
Steckel, Lawrence E. ;
Hayes, Robert M. ;
Mueller, Thomas C. .
WEED SCIENCE, 2006, 54 (06) :1101-1105
[9]   Response of selected horseweed (Conyza canadensis (L.) cronq.) Populations to glyphosate [J].
Main, CL ;
Mueller, TC ;
Hayes, RM ;
Wilkerson, JB .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2004, 52 (04) :879-883
[10]  
MAIN CL, 2008, P S WEED SCI SOC, V61, P102