Research on the Information Quality Measurement of Judicial Documents

被引:4
作者
Lian, Hao [1 ]
He, Tieke [1 ]
Qin, Zemin [1 ]
Li, Haoyu [1 ]
Liu, Jia [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, State Key Lab Novel Software Technol, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
2018 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE QUALITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY COMPANION (QRS-C) | 2018年
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Judicial documents; Data quality; Objective information theory; Rough set; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1109/QRS-C.2018.00043
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper explores and defines data quality metrics of document data in judicial field. The objective information theory defines information as an objective reflection of the objects and the state of movement in the objective world and the subjective world. All kinds of information systems in physics can obtain, transmit, process and apply various objective information. Document is the carrier of case information, and the entity mapping of cases in the objective world. In order to describe the nature of the case information and its various dimensions accurately, this paper constructs and quantifies the data quality evaluation standards of the documents with the help of six-tuple information theory and the related knowledge of rough sets.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 181
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality Measurement of Judgment Documents
    Liu, Jiawei
    Wang, Zhenzhen
    Yan, Ge
    Lian, Hao
    2019 COMPANION OF THE 19TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE QUALITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY (QRS-C 2019), 2019, : 296 - 299
  • [2] Data measurement in research information systems: metrics for the evaluation of data quality
    Azeroual, Otmane
    Saake, Gunter
    Wastl, Jurgen
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 115 (03) : 1271 - 1290
  • [3] Data measurement in research information systems: metrics for the evaluation of data quality
    Otmane Azeroual
    Gunter Saake
    Jürgen Wastl
    Scientometrics, 2018, 115 : 1271 - 1290
  • [4] On the Examination and Perfection of Judicial Documents in China
    Li, Wei
    2017 2ND ICMIBI INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCE AND BUSINESS (ICMIBI-ASSB 2017), 2017, 77 : 159 - 162
  • [5] Computer Aided Anonymization and Redaction of Judicial Documents
    Sladic, Goran
    Gostojic, Stevan
    Milosavljevic, Branko
    Konjovic, Zora
    Milosavljevic, Gordana
    COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2016, 13 (01) : 217 - 236
  • [6] On the Development of a User-Defined Quality Measurement Tool for XML Documents
    Pardede, Eric
    Gaur, Tejasvi
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT: ASIAN EXPERIENCES, 2011, : 213 - 221
  • [7] Evaluation criteria for information quality research
    Woodall P.
    Borek A.
    Parlikad A.K.
    Woodall, Philip (phil.woodall@eng.cam.ac.uk), 2016, Inderscience Publishers, 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland (04) : 124 - 148
  • [8] Research and Implementation of Information Quality Improvement
    Chen, Bing
    Wang, Beizhan
    Zheng, Chengman
    Hu, Xueqin
    FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COOPERATION AND PROMOTION OF INFORMATION RESOURCES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (COINFO 2009), 2009, : 225 - +
  • [9] Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier
    Lukyanenko, Roman
    Wiggins, Andrea
    Rosser, Holly K.
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2020, 22 (04) : 961 - 983
  • [10] Measuring data quality in information systems research
    Timmerman, Yoram
    Bronselaer, Antoon
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2019, 126