Narrow personality traits and organizational attraction: Evidence for the complementary hypothesis

被引:43
作者
Kausel, Edgar E. [1 ]
Slaughter, Jerel E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Fac Econ & Business, Santiago 6510015, Chile
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Management & Org, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
Recruitment; Interactionist perspective; Applicant attraction; Organization personality; Narrow traits; Big Five; Person-organization fit; Trust; Assertiveness; Imagination; CORE SELF-EVALUATIONS; JOB CHOICE; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; APPLICANT ATTRACTION; SYMBOLIC ATTRIBUTES; FIT; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; NEUROTICISM; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Although the interactionist perspective has been widely studied in organizational attractiveness, there is no research comparing the explanatory power of the complementary and supplementary hypotheses in predicting attraction. The authors test these perspectives in the context of the instrumental-symbolic framework. The authors also examine whether the use of narrow personality facets, such as Trust (under the Big Five trait Agreeableness), Assertiveness (under Extraversion), and Imagination (under Openness to Experience) enhances the prediction of attraction. Job seekers (N = 220) provided self-ratings of personality, ratings of organizational traits, and their level of attraction to a potential future employer. Results supported predictions based on complementarity, suggesting that organizations adopting a recruiting strategy based on similarity in personality may not succeed in attracting their most preferred candidates. The findings also suggested that narrow facets are useful in predicting attraction, providing further evidence for the predictive benefits of narrow personality traits. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 14
页数:12
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]   Dimensions of brand personality [J].
Aaker, JL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1997, 34 (03) :347-356
[2]  
Aiken LS., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[3]  
Aldrich H.E., 1976, Annual Review of Sociology, V2
[4]   In Search of the Right Touch: Interpersonal Assertiveness in Organizational Life [J].
Ames, Daniel R. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 17 (06) :381-385
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1968, Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values: A Theory of Organization and Change
[7]  
Ashton MC, 1998, J ORGAN BEHAV, V19, P289, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<289::AID-JOB841>3.3.CO
[8]  
2-3
[9]   A tale of two job markets: Organizational size and its effects on hiring practices and job search behavior [J].
Barber, AE ;
Wesson, MJ ;
Roberson, QM ;
Taylor, MS .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 52 (04) :841-867
[10]   Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques [J].
Bauer, DJ ;
Curran, PJ .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (03) :373-400