Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of remifentanil-based general anesthesia: a survey of clinical economics under the Japanese health care system

被引:7
作者
Nakada, Takeo [1 ,3 ]
Ikeda, Daisuke [1 ]
Yokota, Miyuki [2 ]
Kawahara, Kazuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Hlth Policy Sci, Grad Sch, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138519, Japan
[2] Canc Inst Hosp, Div Anesthesia & Pain Med, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Tohjun Hosp, Div Anesthesia, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Remifentanil; Cost-effectiveness; Clinical economics; Fentanyl; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; SEVOFLURANE; PROPOFOL; SURGERY; DESFLURANE;
D O I
10.1007/s00540-010-1006-2
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Remifentanil has been available in Japan for 3 years. The use of this new opioid is considered a useful adjuvant to general anesthesia. Knowing the exact cost-effectiveness of remifentanil should lead to improved anesthetic outcomes with a reasonable cost. This single-blinded, prospective, randomized study compared the cost of remifentanil-based general anesthesia combined with isoflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol with fentanyl-based conventional techniques in 210 women who underwent breast surgeries. Remifentanil-based general anesthesia was no more expensive than fentanyl-based conventional anesthesia. Postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly less frequent after remifentanil-based than fentanyl-based anesthesia. This study shows that remifentanil-based general anesthesia is no more expensive than conventional fentanyl-based anesthesia under the Japanese health care system because of the small difference in price between remifentanil and fentanyl.
引用
收藏
页码:832 / 837
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Is physician anesthesia cost-effective?
    Abenstein, JP
    Long, KH
    McGlinch, BP
    Dietz, NM
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 98 (03) : 750 - 757
  • [2] A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of remifentanil versus fentanyl as an adjuvant to general anesthesia for outpatient gynecologic surgery
    Beers, RA
    Calimlim, JR
    Uddoh, E
    Esposito, BF
    Camporesi, EM
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (06) : 1420 - 1425
  • [3] RETRACTED: Economic considerations of the use of new anesthetics: A comparison of propofol, sevoflurane, desflurane, and isoflurane (Retracted article. See vol. 131, 2020)
    Boldt, J
    Jaun, N
    Kumle, B
    Heck, M
    Mund, K
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (03) : 504 - 509
  • [4] Croinin Donall F, 2002, Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, V15, P359, DOI 10.1097/00001503-200206000-00014
  • [5] Association between nitrous oxide and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fernandez-Guisasola, J.
    Gomez-Arnau, J. I.
    Cabrera, Y.
    Garcia del Valle, S.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 65 (04) : 379 - 387
  • [6] Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Gan, Tong J.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (06) : 1884 - 1898
  • [7] Gene expression profiling of nephrotoxicity from the sevoflurane degradation product fluoromethyl-2,2-difluoro-1-(trifluoromethyl)vinyl ether ("compound A") in rats
    Kharasch, ED
    Schroeder, JL
    Bammler, T
    Beyer, R
    Srinouanprachanh, S
    [J]. TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2006, 90 (02) : 419 - 431
  • [8] Measuring the costs of inhaled anaesthetics
    Lockwood, GG
    White, DC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (04) : 559 - 563
  • [9] Prospective, randomized cost analysis of anesthesia with remifentanil combined with propofol, desflurane or sevoflurane for otorhinolaryngeal surgery
    Loop, T
    Priebe, HJ
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 46 (10) : 1251 - 1260
  • [10] *ORG EC COOP DEV, OECD HLTH DAT 2009 H