Clinimetric properties of illness perception questionnaire revised (IPQ-R) and brief illness perception questionnaire (Brief IPQ) in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review

被引:69
|
作者
Leysen, Marijke [1 ,2 ]
Nijs, Jo [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Meeus, Mira [1 ,2 ,7 ]
van Wilgen, C. Paul [2 ,4 ]
Struyf, Filip [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vermandel, Alexandra [1 ,6 ]
Kuppens, Kevin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Roussel, Nathalie A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Rehabil Sci & Physiotherapy REVAKI, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Phys Educ, Dept Physiotherapy, Pain Mot Res Grp, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Phys Educ & Physiotherapy, Dept Human Physiol, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Transcare, Transdisciplinary Pain Management Ctr, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Hosp Brussels, Dept Phys Med & Physiotherapy, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Urol, Antwerp, Belgium
[7] Univ Ghent, Fac Med, Ghent Univ Hosp, REVAKI,6K3, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Musculoskeletal pain; Epidemiologic methods; Questionnaires; Perception; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; PRIMARY-CARE; HEALTH; PAIN; VALIDITY; COSMIN; FIBROMYALGIA; INSTRUMENTS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.math.2014.05.001
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Several questionnaires are available to evaluate illness perceptions in patients, such as the illness perception questionnaire revised (IPQ-R) and the brief version (Brief IPQ). This study aims to systematically review the literature concerning the clinimetric properties of the IPQ-R and the Brief IPQ in patients with musculoskeletal pain. The electronic databases Web of Sciences and PubMed were searched. Studies were included when the clinimetric properties of the IPQ-R or Brief IPQ were assessed in adults with musculoskeletal pain. Methodological quality was determined using the COSMIN checklist. Eight articles were included and evaluated. The methodological quality was good for 3 COSMIN boxes, fair for 11 and poor for 3 boxes. None of the articles obtained an excellent methodological score. The results of this review suggest that the IPQ-R is a reliable questionnaire, except for illness coherence. Internal consistency is good, except for the causal domain. The IPQ-R has good construct validity, but the factor structure is unstable. Hence, the IPQ-R appears to be a useful instrument for assessing illness perceptions, but care must be taken when generalizing the results of adapted versions of the questionnaires. The Brief IPQ shows moderate overall test-retest reliability. No articles examining the validity of the Brief IPQ were found. Further research should therefore focus on the content and criterion validity of the IPQ-R and the clinimetric properties of the Brief IPQ. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 17
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Gender differences revealed by the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire in allergic rhinitis
    Pesut, Dragica
    Raskovic, Sanvila
    Tomic-Spiric, Vesna
    Bulajic, Milica
    Bogic, Mirjana
    Bursuc, Bogdana
    Peric-Popadic, Aleksandra
    CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (03) : 364 - 368
  • [22] Validity and reliability of a Malay version of the brief illness perception questionnaire for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Boon-How Chew
    Rimke C. Vos
    Monique Heijmans
    Sazlina Shariff-Ghazali
    Aaron Fernandez
    Guy E. H. M. Rutten
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17
  • [23] Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the revised illness perception questionnaire for patients with hypertension
    Al-Ghamdi, Sameer
    Al Muaddi, Alhaytham Mohammed
    Alqahtani, Nawaf Ali
    Alhasoon, Tamim Yahya
    Basalem, Abdulaziz Abdullah
    Altamimi, Abdulrahman Abdullah
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [24] Utility of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire to Monitor Patient Beliefs in Systemic Vasculitis
    Schwartz, Mollie N.
    Rimland, Casey A.
    Quinn, Kaitlin A.
    Ferrada, Marcela A.
    Gribbons, K. Bates
    Rosenblum, Joel S.
    Goodspeed, Wendy
    Novakovich, Elaine
    Grayson, Peter C.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 47 (12) : 1785 - 1792
  • [25] Validation of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire in Turkish epilepsy patients and the effects of earthquake experience on perception of disease
    Guler, Selda Keskin
    Guler, Sertac
    Cokal, Burcu Gokce
    Gunes, Nalan
    Yon, Mehmet Ilker
    Yoldas, Tahir Kurtulus
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2017, 13 : 551 - 556
  • [26] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of an Arabic language version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire in Lebanon
    Saarti, Stephanie
    Jabbour, Hicham
    El Osta, Nada
    Hajj, Aline
    Khabbaz, Lydia Rabbaa
    LIBYAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 11
  • [27] Reliability and validation of Swedish translation of Beliefs about Medication Specific (BMQ-Specific) and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) for use in adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
    Emilsson, Maria
    Berndtsson, Ina
    Gustafsson, Per A.
    Horne, Robert
    Marteinsdottir, Ina
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 74 (02) : 89 - 95
  • [28] Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the brief illness perception questionnaire in breast cancer survivors
    Zhang, Na
    Fielding, Richard
    Soong, Inda
    Chan, Karen K. K.
    Lee, Conrad
    Ng, Alice
    Sze, Wing Kin
    Tsang, Janice
    Lee, Victor
    Lam, Wendy Wing Tak
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [29] Psychometric Testing of the Bahasa Version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire among Indonesians with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Rias, Yohanes Andy
    Abiddin, Andi Hayyun
    Huda, Nuh
    Handayani, Sri
    Sirait, Healthy Seventina
    Pien, Li-Chung
    Weng, Shuen-Fu
    Tsai, Hsiu-Ting
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (18)
  • [30] A network analysis of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire in patients with rheumatic diseases and human immunodeficiency virus infection
    Shim, Eun-Jung
    Jeong, Donghee
    Song, Yeong Wook
    Lee, Sun Hee
    Kim, Nam Joong
    Hahm, Bong-Jin
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2020, 35 (07) : 838 - 853