Clinimetric properties of illness perception questionnaire revised (IPQ-R) and brief illness perception questionnaire (Brief IPQ) in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review

被引:69
|
作者
Leysen, Marijke [1 ,2 ]
Nijs, Jo [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Meeus, Mira [1 ,2 ,7 ]
van Wilgen, C. Paul [2 ,4 ]
Struyf, Filip [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vermandel, Alexandra [1 ,6 ]
Kuppens, Kevin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Roussel, Nathalie A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Rehabil Sci & Physiotherapy REVAKI, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Phys Educ, Dept Physiotherapy, Pain Mot Res Grp, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Phys Educ & Physiotherapy, Dept Human Physiol, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Transcare, Transdisciplinary Pain Management Ctr, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Hosp Brussels, Dept Phys Med & Physiotherapy, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Urol, Antwerp, Belgium
[7] Univ Ghent, Fac Med, Ghent Univ Hosp, REVAKI,6K3, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Musculoskeletal pain; Epidemiologic methods; Questionnaires; Perception; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; PRIMARY-CARE; HEALTH; PAIN; VALIDITY; COSMIN; FIBROMYALGIA; INSTRUMENTS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.math.2014.05.001
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Several questionnaires are available to evaluate illness perceptions in patients, such as the illness perception questionnaire revised (IPQ-R) and the brief version (Brief IPQ). This study aims to systematically review the literature concerning the clinimetric properties of the IPQ-R and the Brief IPQ in patients with musculoskeletal pain. The electronic databases Web of Sciences and PubMed were searched. Studies were included when the clinimetric properties of the IPQ-R or Brief IPQ were assessed in adults with musculoskeletal pain. Methodological quality was determined using the COSMIN checklist. Eight articles were included and evaluated. The methodological quality was good for 3 COSMIN boxes, fair for 11 and poor for 3 boxes. None of the articles obtained an excellent methodological score. The results of this review suggest that the IPQ-R is a reliable questionnaire, except for illness coherence. Internal consistency is good, except for the causal domain. The IPQ-R has good construct validity, but the factor structure is unstable. Hence, the IPQ-R appears to be a useful instrument for assessing illness perceptions, but care must be taken when generalizing the results of adapted versions of the questionnaires. The Brief IPQ shows moderate overall test-retest reliability. No articles examining the validity of the Brief IPQ were found. Further research should therefore focus on the content and criterion validity of the IPQ-R and the clinimetric properties of the Brief IPQ. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 17
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [11] Validation of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) in a sample of persons recovering from myocardial infarction - the Swedish version
    Brink, Eva
    Alsen, Pia
    Cliffordson, Christina
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 52 (06) : 573 - 579
  • [12] The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire
    Broadbent, Elizabeth
    Petrie, Keith J.
    Main, Jodie
    Weinman, John
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2006, 60 (06) : 631 - 637
  • [13] Psychometric approach of the revised illness perception questionnaire for oral health (IPQ-R-OH) in patients with periodontal disease
    Mafla, Ana C.
    Herrera-Lopez, Harvey M.
    Villalobos-Galvis, Fredy H.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 90 (02) : 177 - 188
  • [14] Illness perception in Polish patients with chronic diseases: Psychometric properties of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire
    Nowicka-Sauer, Katarzyna
    Banaszkiewicz, Dorota
    Staskiewicz, Izabela
    Kopczynski, Piotr
    Hajduk, Adam
    Czuszynska, Zenobia
    Ejdys, Mariola
    Szostakiewicz, Malgorzata
    Sablinska, Agnieszka
    Kaluzna, Anna
    Tomaszewska, Magda
    Siebert, Janusz
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 21 (08) : 1739 - 1749
  • [15] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire
    Broadbent, Elizabeth
    Wilkes, Carissa
    Koschwanez, Heidi
    Weinman, John
    Norton, Sam
    Petrie, Keith J.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2015, 30 (11) : 1361 - 1385
  • [16] An illness-specific version of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF IPQ-R): Unpacking beliefs about treatment control, personal control and symptom triggers
    Taylor, Elaina C.
    O'Neill, Mark
    Hughes, Lyndsay D.
    Moss-Morris, Rona
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2018, 33 (04) : 499 - 517
  • [17] Reliability and validity of a Farsi version of the brief illness perception questionnaire
    Bazzazian, Saeideh
    Besharat, Mohammad Ali
    WCPCG 2010, 2010, 5 : 962 - 965
  • [18] The reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire
    Latos Melinda
    Lazar Gyorgy
    Csabai Marta
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2021, 162 (06) : 212 - 218
  • [19] Validity and reliability of a Malay version of the brief illness perception questionnaire for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Chew, Boon-How
    Vos, Rimke C.
    Heijmans, Monique
    Shariff-Ghazali, Sazlina
    Fernandez, Aaron
    Rutten, Guy E. H. M.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [20] Evaluating the Turkish validity and reliability of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire in periodontal diseases
    Onder, Canan
    Bakirarar, Batuhan
    PEERJ, 2023, 11