Cultivating learners' technology-mediated dialogue of feedback in writing: processes, potentials and limitations

被引:15
作者
Abdu Saeed Mohammed, Murad [1 ]
Abdullah Alharbi, Mohammed [2 ]
机构
[1] Qassim Univ, Dept English, Unaizah Coll Sci & Arts, Qasim, Saudi Arabia
[2] Majmaah Univ, Dept English, Coll Educ, Majmaah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Technology; feedback dialogue; uptake; writing; STUDENT;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2021.1969637
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Despite contemporary research calls for promoting learners' feedback dialogue, how feedback dialogue occurs and contributes to learners' uptake has been little addressed. This study on 28 pairs of EFL undergraduates attempts to explore the process of feedback dialogue, its potential and the main factors affecting it. The data collected from learners' screencast records of feedback dialogue archived in Blackboard Collaborate Ultra, first and final essay drafts in Google Docs, notes on students' screencast dialogue and follow-up interviews were analyzed. Findings illustrate that learners engaged in multidirectional (writer-writer, writer-non-writer and writer-teacher) and bimodal (oral/voice and written) dialogue and negotiations. The observed and perceived potential of feedback dialogue is realized through learners' understanding of feedback, revising and enhancing their writing and learning how to give feedback as well as reducing instructor's time in giving feedback. Yet, learners' engagement in dialogue varied among the pairs from high to moderate/partial and low. Factors behind this variation are learner-related, teacher feedback formulation-related, learner-pairing and grouping-related as well as technical issue-related.
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 958
页数:17
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   The development and application of coding frameworks to explore dialogic feedback interactions and self-regulated learning [J].
Adie, Lenore ;
van der Kleij, Fabienne ;
Cumming, Joy .
BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 44 (04) :704-723
[2]   Feedback that works: a realist review of feedback interventions for written tasks [J].
Ajjawi, Rola ;
Kent, Fiona ;
Broadbent, Jaclyn ;
Tai, Joanna Hong-Meng ;
Bearman, Margaret ;
Boud, David .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 47 (07) :1343-1356
[3]   Exploring the potential of Google Doc in facilitating innovative teaching and learning practices in an EFL writing course [J].
Alharbi, Mohammed Abdullah .
INNOVATION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING, 2020, 14 (03) :227-242
[4]  
Bakla A, 2020, LANG LEARN TECHNOL, V24, P107
[5]   Using screencasting to give feedback for academic writing [J].
Bush, Jerome C. .
INNOVATION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING, 2021, 15 (05) :473-486
[6]  
Carless D., 2020, TEACH HIGH EDUC, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/13562517.2020.1863355
[7]   From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes [J].
Carless, David .
ACTIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 23 (02) :143-153
[8]   Managing dialogic use of exemplars [J].
Carless, David ;
Chan, Kennedy Kam Ho .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (06) :930-941
[9]  
Cheng D., 2020, COMPUTERS COMPOSITIO, V58, DOI [10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102612, DOI 10.1016/J.COMPCOM.2020.102612]
[10]   How language choices in feedback change with technology: Engagement in text and screencast feedback on ESL writing [J].
Cunningham, Kelly J. .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2019, 135 :91-99