Danish translation and validation of the Self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) in patients with ankle related fractures

被引:5
|
作者
Erichsen, J. L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jensen, C. [1 ,4 ]
Larsen, M. S. [2 ,3 ]
Damborg, F. [1 ]
Viberg, B. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Southern, Lillebaelt Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg & Traumatol, Sygehusvej 24, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg & Traumatol, JB Winslovvej 15, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern, Inst Clin Res, JB Winslovvej 19-3, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern, Inst Reg Hlth Res, JB Winslovvej 19-3, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
关键词
Ankle-fractures; PROM; Psychometric properties; Reliability; SEFAS; Translation; Validation; AMERICAN ORTHOPEDIC FOOT; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; HEALTH-STATUS; SOCIETY ANKLE; HINDFOOT; RESPONSIVENESS; RELIABILITY; AGREEMENT; VALIDITY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fas.2020.06.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) is a patient-reported outcome measure used to evaluate foot and ankle disorders. The purpose of this study was to translate, cross-culturally adapt and validate the Danish language version of the SEFAS in patients with ankle-related fractures. Methods: Forward-backward translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation were performed. In total, 125 patients completed the SEFAS-DKandtheDanish version of American OrthopaedicFoot and Ankle Score (AOFAS-DK) at three time points after the date of fracture. The evaluation was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Results: The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) level of the SEFAS-DK total score was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.96). Cronbach's alpha (CA) for the SEFAS-DK was 0.93, while the floor and ceiling effect at week 6 post-injury was 22.4%. Construct validity was correlated with the AOFAS, and >75% of the pre-defined hypotheses could be confirmed. Responsiveness was analysed using longitudinal data. The minimal clinical important change (MCIC) showed that the SEFAS-DK detects changes in physical function over time. Conclusion: The Danish version of the SEFAS showed overall good reliability, validity and responsiveness. SEFAS-DK can be used to evaluate physical function in patients with ankle-related fractures. Level of evidence: level II, prospective cohort study. (C) 2020 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 527
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The completely patient-reported version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score: A valid and reliable measurement for ankle osteoarthritis
    Paget, Liam D. A.
    Sierevelt, Inger N.
    Tol, Johannes L.
    Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J.
    Reurink, Gustaaf
    JOURNAL OF ISAKOS JOINT DISORDERS & ORTHOPAEDIC SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 8 (05) : 345 - 351
  • [32] Validation of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) in individuals with chronic ankle instability: a cross-sectional observational study
    Goulart Neto, Antonio Manoel
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Migliorini, Filippo
    de Menezes, Fabio Sprada
    Okubo, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [33] Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Scale in Patients With Hallux Valgus in Colombia
    Castro, Julian David Molano
    Alvarez, Rosimar Sardoth
    Betancur, Andrea Franco
    Montenegro, Gabriel Eduardo Vargas
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2023, 62 (03) : 511 - 518
  • [34] Validation of the Turkish version of the Revised Foot Function Index for patients with foot and ankle disorders
    Yagci, Gozde
    Erel, Suat
    Okunakol, Vural
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (06) : 624 - 629
  • [35] Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation
    Gonzalez-Sanchez, Manuel
    Li, Guang Zhi
    Ruiz Munoz, Maria
    Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 39 (21) : 2182 - 2189
  • [36] EFAS Score - Validation of Danish Version by the Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS)
    Richter, Martinus
    Agren, Per-Henrik
    Besse, Jean-Luc
    Coester, Maria
    Kofoed, Hakon
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Steultjens, Martijn
    Nielsen, Mick
    Johansen, Jens Kurt
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2024, 30 (04) : 294 - 298
  • [37] EFAS Score - Multilingual development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) by the score committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS)
    Richter, Martinus
    Agren, Per-Henrik
    Besse, Jean-Luc
    Coster, Maria
    Kofoed, Hakon
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Rosenbaum, Dieter
    Steultjens, Martijn
    Alvarez, Fernando
    Boszczyk, Andrzej
    Buedts, Kris
    Guelfi, Marco
    Liszka, Henryk
    Louwerens, Jan-Willem
    Repo, Jussi P.
    Samaila, Elena
    Stephens, Michael
    Witteveen, Angelique G. H.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2018, 24 (03) : 185 - 204
  • [38] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of an Arabic version of the American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)
    Alhadhoud, Meshal
    Alsiri, Najla
    Alsaffar, Maryam
    Glazebrook, Mark
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (08) : 876 - 882
  • [39] Evaluation and Validation of the Dutch European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) Score
    Palmen, Leonieke N.
    Kosse, Nienke M.
    van Hooff, Miranda L.
    Witteveen, Angelique G. H.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2022, 61 (03) : 464 - 470
  • [40] Reliability and validity of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score: a validation study from Iran
    Negahban, Hossein
    Mazaheri, Masood
    Salavati, Mahyar
    Sohani, Soheil Mansour
    Askari, Marjan
    Fanian, Hossein
    Parnianpour, Mohamad
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 29 (05) : 479 - 486