Two reconstructive techniques for flatfoot deformity comparing contact characteristics of the hindfoot joints

被引:33
作者
McCormack, AP
Niki, H
Kiser, P
Tencer, AF
Sangeorzan, BJ
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Orthoped, Harborview Med Ctr, Biomech Lab, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Surg Serv, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/107110079801900706
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The effect of two different methods of reconstruction of flatfoot deformity and the role of the posterior tibial tendon on the contact characteristics of the hindfoot joints were quantified using pressure-sensitive film. Each of 10 cadaver feet was loaded quasi-statically by an axial compressive force to simulate varying loads. First, a specimen was tested intact, then it was tested after sectioning the spring ligament and loading the specimen cyclically to create one type of flatfoot deformity. It was then tested again after reconstructing the deformity. Reconstructions used were the Dillwyn-Evans procedure (bone graft in osteotomy of the calcaneus) or the calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis (CCDA). We found that surgically produced flatfoot deformity altered mainly the talonavicular joint, by decreasing its contact area. The Dillwyn-Evans method had less effect on the talonavicular joint (altering 2 of 6 measured parameters) than the CCDA (3 of 6) and more effect on the anteriomedial facet (altering 3 of 6 parameters) than the CCDA (1 of 6). The Dillwyn-Evans method had more effect on the posterior facet (altering 2 of 6 measured parameters) than the CCDA (1 of 6). Function of the posterior tibial tendon had no effect on contact characteristics of the hindfoot joints after either type of reconstruction. These findings are based on measurements using a quasi-statically-loaded foot model at three selected positions, and results may be different with dynamic loading.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 461
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ANDERSON JG, 1996, T 42 M ORTH RES SOC, V21, P394
[2]   Motion of the hindfoot after simulated arthrodesis [J].
Astion, DJ ;
Deland, JT ;
Otis, JC ;
Kenneally, S .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 79A (02) :241-246
[3]   A COMPARISON OF SCAPHOID-TRAPEZIUM-TRAPEZOID FUSION AND 4-BONE TENDON WEAVE FOR SCAPHOLUNATE DISSOCIATION [J].
AUGSBURGER, S ;
NECKING, L ;
HORTON, J ;
BACH, AW ;
TENCER, AF .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 17A (02) :360-369
[4]  
BEAUDOIN AJ, 1991, FOOT ANKLE, V12, P19, DOI 10.1177/107110079101200104
[5]  
Brody D M, 1980, Clin Symp, V32, P1
[6]  
CHAMBERS E F S, 1946, West J Surg Obstet Gynecol, V54, P77
[7]  
Cowan D N, 1993, Arch Fam Med, V2, P773, DOI 10.1001/archfami.2.7.773
[8]   ADULT ACQUIRED FLATFOOT DEFORMITY AT THE TALONAVICULAR JOINT - RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SPRING LIGAMENT IN AN INVITRO MODEL [J].
DELAND, JT ;
ARNOCZKY, SP ;
THOMPSON, FM .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1992, 13 (06) :327-332
[9]  
DWYER F C, 1964, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, V34, P120
[10]   CALCANEO-VALGUS DEFORMITY [J].
EVANS, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1975, 57 (03) :270-278