Bioslurry as a Fuel. 1. Viability of a Bioslurry-Based Bioenergy Supply Chain for Mallee Biomass in Western Australia

被引:63
作者
Wu, Hongwei [1 ]
Yu, Yun [1 ]
Yip, Kongvui [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Curtin Ctr Adv Energy Sci & Engn, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
关键词
FAST PYROLYSIS; WOODY CROPS; ENERGY; OIL; TEMPERATURE; COMBUSTION; TRANSPORT; BIOCHARS; QUALITY; ASH;
D O I
10.1021/ef1008105
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the economic feasibility of a bioenergy supply chain based on bioslurry (i.e., bio-oil/char slurry) for malice biomass in Western Australia (WA). The bioslurry-based supply chain utilizes distributed pyrolysers within the biomass production area, converts the harvested green biomass into bioslurry fuels, and then delivers the bioslurry fuels to a central bioenergy plant. The results show that the overall economic feasibility of such a supply chain depends on the trade-off between the reduction in biomass transport cost and the increase in costs due to the introduction of distributed pyrolysers (including bioslurry preparation) and bioslurry transport. For a dedicated bioenergy plant situated within the biomass production area, a bioslurry-based supply chain is only competitive on a large scale (e.g., > 1500 dry tonnes per day), and small bioenergy plants (e.g., < 500 dry tonnes per day) still favor a conventional biomass supply chain. However, a bioslurry-based supply chain offers significant advantages in reducing the delivered cost of fuels at the plant gate when the central bioenergy plant is distant from biomass production area. This is the case for cofiring biomass/bioslurry in coal-fired power stations in WA. Bioslurry offers significant advantages to address the key issues associated with biomass utilization, including high transport cost, poor grindability and mismatch in fuel properties if coprocessing with coal. A bioslurry-based supply chain also makes it economically feasible to substantially increase the uptake of bioenergy proportion in coal-fired power stations, e.g., from 5% in a biomass supply chain to 20% in a bioslurry-based bioenergy supply chain.
引用
收藏
页码:5652 / 5659
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] ABDULLAH H, 2010, ENERG FUEL, DOI DOI 10.1021/EFL008117
  • [2] Biochar as a Fuel: 2. Significant Differences in Fuel Quality and Ash Properties of Biochars from Various Biomass Components of Mallee Trees
    Abdullah, Hanisom
    Mediaswanti, Kun Aussieanita
    Wu, Hongwei
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2010, 24 (03) : 1972 - 1979
  • [3] Biochar as a Fuel: 1. Properties and Grindability of Biochars Produced from the Pyrolysis of Mallee Wood under Slow-Heating Conditions
    Abdullah, Hanisom
    Wu, Hongwei
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2009, 23 (08) : 4174 - 4181
  • [4] [Anonymous], COAL BIOMASS COFIRIN
  • [5] Mineral Content of Grasses Grown for Seed in Low Rainfall Areas of the Pacific Northwest and Analysis of Ash from Gasification of Bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) Straw
    Banowetz, Gary A.
    Griffith, Stephen A.
    El-Nashaar, Hossien A.
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2009, 23 (1-2) : 502 - 506
  • [6] Scale of biomass production from new woody crops for salinity control in dryland agriculture in Australia
    Bartle, John
    Olsen, Graeme
    Cooper, Don
    Hobbs, Trevor
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ENERGY ISSUES, 2007, 27 (02) : 115 - 137
  • [7] Toward Sustainable Production of Second Generation Bioenergy Feedstocks
    Bartle, John R.
    Abadi, Amir
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2010, 24 (01) : 2 - 9
  • [8] Biomass oil slurry fuels: An investigation into their preparation and formulation
    Benter, MM
    Gilmour, IA
    Arnoux, L
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1997, 12 (04) : 253 - 261
  • [9] Bergman P.C.A., 2005, TORREFACTION ENTRAIN
  • [10] Drivers behind the development of forest energy in Sweden
    Björheden, R
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (04) : 289 - 295