Dutch abiogenic emissions of methane and nitrous oxide and options for emission reduction

被引：1
|
作者：
Oonk, H
机构：
[1] TNO, Netherlands Org. for Appl. Sci. Res., P.O. Box 342, 7300 AH, Apeldoorn, Netherlands
来源：
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT | 1996年 / 37卷 / 6-8期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/0196-8904(95)00288-X
中图分类号：
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Abiogenic emissions contribute to about half of the total Dutch emissions of methane and nitrous oxide. In the Netherlands, options for reducing methane emissions from landfills and from the oil and gas system are identified and are being implemented at this moment. As a result of existing waste policy, formation and emission of methane will be gradually phased our. in the next century. In de mean-time methane emissions are reduced by landfill gas recovery. Emission from the oil and gas production, transport and distribution will be gradually reduced as a result of various process adaptions. The overall result is, that methane emissions will be significantly decreased in the near future. With respect to nitrous oxide, options for emission reduction are not investigated that well. The production of nitric acid seems to be a promising opportunity for reducing Dutch methane emissions with about 40%, when adequate technology becomes available.
引用
收藏
页码：985 / 989
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global methane and nitrous oxide emissions: Options and potential for reduction
    Hendriks, CA
    de Jager, D
    NON-CO2 GREENHOUSE GASES: SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING, CONTROL AND IMPLEMENTATION, 2000, : 433 - 445
  • [2] Global methane and nitrous oxide emissions and reduction potentials in agriculture
    Hasegawa, Tomoko
    Matsuoka, Yuzuru
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2010, 7 : 245 - 256
  • [3] Mitigation Options for Methane, Nitrous Oxide and Nitric Oxide Emissions from Agricultural Ecosystems
    Zheng X.
    Wang M.
    Wang Y.
    Shen R.
    Li J.
    Heyer J.
    Koegge M.
    Papen H.
    Jin J.
    Li L.
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2000, 17 (1) : 83 - 92
  • [4] Mitigation options for methane, nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from agricultural ecosystems
    Zheng, XH
    Wang, MX
    Wang, YS
    Shen, RX
    Li, J
    Heyer, J
    Koegge, M
    Papen, H
    Jin, JS
    Li, LT
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2000, 17 (01) : 83 - 92
  • [5] Mitigation Options for Methane, Nitrous Oxide and NitricOxide Emissions from Agricultural Ecosystems
    郑循华
    王明星
    王跃思
    沈壬兴
    李晶
    J.Heyer
    M.Koegge
    H.Papen
    金继生
    李老土
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2000, (01) : 83 - 92
  • [6] Emission factors for methane and nitrous oxide from manure management and mitigation options
    Groenestein, Karin
    Mosquera, Julio
    Van der Sluis, Sietske
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2012, 9 : 139 - 146
  • [7] Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural fields in Japan and mitigation options: a review
    Akiyama, Hiroko
    SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2024, 70 (02) : 79 - 87
  • [8] Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review
    Gerber, P. J.
    Hristov, A. N.
    Henderson, B.
    Makkar, H.
    Oh, J.
    Lee, C.
    Meinen, R.
    Montes, F.
    Ott, T.
    Firkins, J.
    Rotz, A.
    Dell, C.
    Adesogan, A. T.
    Yang, W. Z.
    Tricarico, J. M.
    Kebreab, E.
    Waghorn, G.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Oosting, S.
    ANIMAL, 2013, 7 : 220 - 234
  • [9] Russian methane emissions: Options for reduction
    Hill, Malcolm R.
    Energy and Environment, 2002, 13 (01): : 57 - 80
  • [10] METHANE AND NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS - AN INTRODUCTION
    VANAMSTEL, AR
    SWART, RJ
    FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1994, 37 (03): : 213 - 225
12345