Supporting Argumentation Through Students' Questions: Case Studies in Science Classrooms

被引:107
作者
Chin, Christine [1 ]
Osborne, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore 637616, Singapore
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
COGNITIVE CONFLICT; SELF-EXPLANATIONS; ANOMALOUS DATA; KNOWLEDGE; DISCOURSE; QUALITY; ACQUISITION; PATTERNS; ASKING; LEARN;
D O I
10.1080/10508400903530036
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study explores how student-generated questions can support argumentation in science. Students were asked to discuss which of two graphs showing the change in temperature with time when ice is heated to steam was correct. Four classes of students, aged 12-14 years, from two countries, first wrote questions about the phenomenon. Then, working in groups with members who differed in their views, they discussed possible answers. To help them structure their arguments, students were given a sheet with prompts to guide their thinking and another sheet on which to represent their argument diagrammatically. One group of students from each class was audiotaped. Data from both students' written work and the taped oral discourse were then analyzed for types of questions asked, the content and function of their talk, and the quality of arguments elicited. To illustrate the dynamic interaction between students' questions and the evolution of their arguments, the discourse of one group is presented as a case study and comparative analyses made with the discourse from the other three groups. Emerging from our analysis is a tentative explanatory model of how different forms of interaction and, in particular, questioning are needed for productive argumentation to occur.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 284
页数:55
相关论文
共 91 条
[51]  
Jiménez-Aleixandre MP, 2000, SCI EDUC, V84, P757, DOI 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO
[52]  
2-F
[53]   Students' reasoning about electricity: combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis [J].
Kelly, GJ ;
Druker, S ;
Chen, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1998, 20 (07) :849-871
[54]   FACILITATING ELABORATIVE LEARNING THROUGH GUIDED STUDENT-GENERATED QUESTIONING [J].
KING, A .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1992, 27 (01) :111-126
[55]   IMPROVEMENT OF READING-COMPREHENSION OF PHYSICS TEXTS BY STUDENTS QUESTION FORMULATION [J].
KOCH, A ;
ECKSTEIN, SG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1991, 13 (04) :473-485
[56]   SCIENCE AS ARGUMENT - IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING SCIENTIFIC THINKING [J].
KUHN, D .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1993, 77 (03) :319-337
[57]   Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning [J].
Kuhn, D ;
Shaw, V ;
Felton, M .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1997, 15 (03) :287-315
[58]   Do students need to be taught how to reason? [J].
Kuhn, Deanna .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2009, 4 (01) :1-6
[59]   The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching [J].
Lawson, AE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2003, 25 (11) :1387-1408
[60]  
Leach J., 1995, School Science Review, V76, P47