Supporting Argumentation Through Students' Questions: Case Studies in Science Classrooms

被引:107
作者
Chin, Christine [1 ]
Osborne, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore 637616, Singapore
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
COGNITIVE CONFLICT; SELF-EXPLANATIONS; ANOMALOUS DATA; KNOWLEDGE; DISCOURSE; QUALITY; ACQUISITION; PATTERNS; ASKING; LEARN;
D O I
10.1080/10508400903530036
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study explores how student-generated questions can support argumentation in science. Students were asked to discuss which of two graphs showing the change in temperature with time when ice is heated to steam was correct. Four classes of students, aged 12-14 years, from two countries, first wrote questions about the phenomenon. Then, working in groups with members who differed in their views, they discussed possible answers. To help them structure their arguments, students were given a sheet with prompts to guide their thinking and another sheet on which to represent their argument diagrammatically. One group of students from each class was audiotaped. Data from both students' written work and the taped oral discourse were then analyzed for types of questions asked, the content and function of their talk, and the quality of arguments elicited. To illustrate the dynamic interaction between students' questions and the evolution of their arguments, the discourse of one group is presented as a case study and comparative analyses made with the discourse from the other three groups. Emerging from our analysis is a tentative explanatory model of how different forms of interaction and, in particular, questioning are needed for productive argumentation to occur.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 284
页数:55
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Alexander R., 2005, Towards dialogic teaching
[2]  
Andriessen J., 2003, Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Studies in Science Education, DOI [DOI 10.1080/03057260208560187, 10.1080/03057260208560187]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Journal of the Learning Sciences, DOI [10.1207/s15327809jls0203_1, DOI 10.1207/S15327809JLS0203_1]
[5]   The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory [J].
Asterhan, Christa S. C. ;
Schwarz, Baruch B. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 99 (03) :626-639
[6]  
Baker M., 2003, ARGUING TO LEARN, P47
[7]  
Barnes D., 1977, Communication and learning in small groups
[8]  
BELL N, 1985, NEW DIR CHILD ADOLES, V29, P41
[9]   Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE [J].
Bell, P ;
Linn, MC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2000, 22 (08) :797-817
[10]   A THEORY OF HUMAN CURIOSITY [J].
Berlyne, D. E. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1954, 45 :180-191