共 25 条
Epididymitis in Patients with Anorectal Malformations: A Cause for Urologic Concern
被引:7
作者:
VanderBrink, Brian A.
[1
]
Sivan, Bezalel
[1
]
Levitt, Marc A.
[1
]
Pena, Alberto
[2
]
Sheldon, Curtis A.
[1
]
Alam, Shumyle
[1
]
机构:
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Urol, Div Pediat Surg, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Colorectal Ctr Children, Div Pediat Surg, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
来源:
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL
|
2014年
/
40卷
/
05期
关键词:
Epididymitis;
Anorectal malformation;
Neurogenic Bladder;
Renal Injury;
LOWER URINARY-TRACT;
POSTERIOR SAGITTAL ANORECTOPLASTY;
IMPERFORATE ANUS;
CHILDREN;
ANOMALIES;
INFANTS;
SYSTEM;
OLDER;
D O I:
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.05.13
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Introduction: Epididymitis in patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) represents a unique problem because unlike the general population, an underlying urinary tract problem is frequently identified. We review our experience with epididymitis in ARM population with an emphasis on examining urologic outcomes. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of male patients with ARM cared for from 1980 to 2010. Clinical and pathologic variables recorded included age at presentation, recurrence, associated urologic anomalies, incidence of ureteral fusion with mesonephric ductal structures, glomerular filtration rate and urodynamic parameters. Results: Twenty-six patients were identified with documented episodes of epididymitis. Renal injury was noted in five patients (19%), all of whom were diagnosed with neurogenic bladder (NGB) several years after anorectoplasty. NGB was found in ten patients (38%) in our series. Ectopic insertion of ureter into a mesonephric ductal structure was discovered in five patients (19%). Twelve patients (46%) had recurrent episodes of epididymitis, with seven of these patients (58%) being diagnosed with NGB. Two patients in the pubertal group presented with a history of epididymitis and complained of ejaculatory pain. Conclusion: Epididymitis in a patient with ARM warrants a comprehensive urologic investigation, particularly in recurrent episodes. Attempts at surgical intervention (e.g. vasectomy) should be avoided until functional assessment of the urinary tract has occurred. Failure to recognize this association may lead to potentially avoidable complications and morbidity. Long term urological follow up of these patients is warranted to identify at risk patients and minimize renal deterioration
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 682
页数:7
相关论文