Validity of SDOF Models for Analyzing Two-Way Reinforced Concrete Panels under Blast Loading

被引:35
作者
El-Dakhakhni, W. W. [1 ]
Mekky, W. F. [2 ]
Rezaei, S. H. Changiz [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Ctr Effect Design Struct, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
[2] Amec Consulting, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada
关键词
Blast loads; Concrete structures; Dynamic response; Finite element models; Nonlinear analysis; Panels; Structural safety; HIGH-STRAIN RATES; ARCHING ACTION; SLABS; FREEDOM;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000090
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The combined manual TM 5-1300/NAVFAC P-397/AFR 88-22, Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions, published by the joint departments of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force, has been used in all NATO countries for the past 50 years for protective design applications. The manual was recently reformatted to meet the Department of Defense Unified Facility Criteria (UFC). As a first step, the current production of the new document, UFC 3-340-02, focused on making the original TM 5-1300 available in a more functional format so that future technical updates can be facilitated. In this study, a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) model, based on the guidelines of the UFC 3-340-02, was used to formulate a FORTRAN code to predict the response of SDOF systems under blast. The code was used to generate pressure-impulse (P-I) diagrams for a series of two-way reinforced concrete (RC) panels with different dimensions, aspect and reinforcement ratios, and support conditions. The P-I diagram predictions were compared to the results of experimentally validated nonlinear explicit finite-element (FE) analyses and significant differences in deflection and shear predictions were observed. The general trend of results and the major characteristics of the P-I diagrams were discussed in terms of the discrepancies between the SDOF and the FE predictions. The work presented in this paper is expected to contribute to improving the modeling provisions of the two-way RC panels in the future edition of the UFC 3-340-02 by understanding the limitations of SDOF models using advanced FE analysis techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 325
页数:15
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 51300 TM US DEP ARM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, 58551 TM US DEP ARM
[3]  
Baker W.E., 1983, Explosion Hazards and Evaluation
[4]   MODELING OF BLAST LOADING ON ABOVEGROUND STRUCTURES .2. INTERNAL BLAST AND GROUND SHOCK [J].
BESHARA, FBA .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1994, 51 (05) :597-606
[5]   COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF CONCRETE AT HIGH-STRAIN RATES [J].
BISCHOFF, PH ;
PERRY, SH .
MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 1991, 24 (144) :425-450
[6]  
BRAESTRUP MW, 1980, J STRUCTURAL DIVISIO, P1237
[7]  
CEB (Comite Euro-International du Beton), 1988, CEB B
[8]  
Christiansen K.P., 1963, STRUCT ENG, V41, P261
[9]  
Conrath E.J., 1999, Structural Design for Physical Security -
[10]  
Department of Defense (DoD), 2003, 401001 DOD UFC