Deliberate control of facial expressions in a go/no-go task: An ERP study

被引:0
作者
Beringer, M. [1 ,3 ]
Wacker, J. [1 ]
Recio, G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Von Melle Pk 5, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Barcelona, Insitute Neurosci, Passeig Vall dHebron 171, ES-08035 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Dillstr 1, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Facial expression; Top -down control; Go; no-go task; Gaze; Mimicry; EMOTIONAL MIMICRY; INHIBITION; PERCEPTION; CHALLENGES; COMPONENTS; MOVEMENT; REFLECTS; IMPACT; FACES; GAZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103773
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In two studies we investigate the role of affective factors and top-down processes underlying production and deliberate control of emotional facial expressions and its neural underpinnings. In Study 1 we examine facial expressions of joy, fear and disgust depending on the emotional content of the visual stimuli (upright faces, inverted faces, emotion inducing pictures without faces). In Study 2 we focus on expressions of joy and disgust depending on gaze direction (with and without eye contact) in a more natural setting with a real person as stimulus. We hypothesized that the more automatic processes are induced by stimuli (e.g., arousal, mimicry or social cues like eye contact) the harder it is to control facial expressions; particularly expressions of joy compared to fear and disgust. In both studies we used go/no-go tasks and showed faster RTs for conditions with upright faces or eye contact, respectively. We also found faster RTs for expressions of joy than of fear and disgust. In Study 1 participants showed more errors in no-go trials for expressions of joy than for expressions of fear and disgust, indicating worse top-down control for expressions of joy than of fear or disgust. An ERP analysis of the no-go P3 in Study 1 revealed larger amplitudes for upright faces compared with both inverted faces and emotion inducing pictures and larger amplitudes for expressions of joy than for disgust. This indicates greater demand of top-down control when automatic mimicry processes are activated and some degree of specificity to particular facial expressions. In Study 2 more errors in no-go trials in conditions with eye contact only for expressions of joy indicate mimicry could be larger for expressions with high affiliative intent like expressions of joy, and reduced mimicry for negative expressions. All results indicate that facial expressions buffered by automatic processes (e. g., mimicry) have a greater need for top-down control, especially expressions of joy compared to expressions of fear and disgust.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Effects of amphetamine, morphine, and CP 55, 940 on Go/No-Go task performance in rhesus monkeys [J].
Koek, Wouter ;
Gerak, Lisa R. ;
France, Charles P. .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 26 (05) :481-484
[32]   The distance effect on discrimination ability and response bias during magnitude comparison in a go/no-go task [J].
Hepdarcan, Ilgim ;
Bulut, Merve ;
Palaz, Ezgi ;
Can, Seda ;
Dural, Seda .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2021, 83 (05) :2052-2060
[33]   Connectivity of the Frontal Cortical Oscillatory Dynamics Underlying Inhibitory Control During a Go/No-Go Task as a Predictive Biomarker in Major Depression [J].
Han, Ying-lin ;
Dai, Zhong-peng ;
Ridwan, Mohammad Chattun ;
Lin, Pin-hua ;
Zhou, Hong-liang ;
Wang, Hao-fei ;
Yao, Zhi-jian ;
Lu, Qing .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 11
[34]   Psychometric Properties of a Combined Go/No-Go and Continuous Performance Task Across Childhood [J].
Clark, Caron A. C. ;
Cook, Kaitlyn ;
Wang, Rui ;
Rueschman, Michael ;
Radcliffe, Jerilynn ;
Redline, Susan ;
Taylor, H. Gerry .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2023, 35 (04) :353-365
[35]   Electrophysiological Correlates of Emotional See-Saw Effect on a Go/No-Go Task [J].
Remigiusz Szczepanowski ;
Michał Folwarczny ;
Magdalena Król ;
Dariusz Doliński ;
Joanna Budzisz .
Current Psychology, 2019, 38 :533-541
[36]   Differential coactivation in a redundant signals task with weak and strong go/no-go stimuli [J].
Minakata, Katsumi ;
Gondan, Matthias .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 72 (04) :922-929
[37]   Preparing for (valenced) action: The role of differential effort in the orthogonalized go/no-go task [J].
Schevernels, Hanne ;
Bombeke, Klaas ;
Krebs, Ruth M. ;
Boehler, C. Nico .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 53 (02) :186-197
[38]   MPQ Control (versus Impulsivity) and Need for Cognition - Relationship to behavioral inhibition and corresponding ERPs in a Go/No-Go task [J].
Sach, M. ;
Enge, S. ;
Strobel, A. ;
Fleischhauer, M. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 121 :200-205
[39]   The role of the interaction between the inferior parietal lobule and superior temporal gyrus in the multisensory Go/No-go task [J].
Sun, Jiaying ;
Huang, Jie ;
Wang, Aijun ;
Zhang, Ming ;
Tang, Xiaoyu .
NEUROIMAGE, 2022, 254
[40]   Strain Differences in Behavioral Inhibition in a Go/No-go Task Demonstrated Using 15 Inbred Mouse Strains [J].
Gubner, Noah R. ;
Wilhelm, Clare J. ;
Phillips, Tamara J. ;
Mitchell, Suzanne H. .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2010, 34 (08) :1353-1362