A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters

被引:12
作者
Deter, Russell L. [1 ]
Lee, Wesley [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh [1 ]
Tarca, Adi L. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Yeo, Lami [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Romero, Roberto [3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Oakland Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, William Beaumont Sch Med, Rochester, MI 48063 USA
[3] NICHD, Perinatol Res Branch, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] NICHD, Perinatol Res Branch, NIH, DHHS, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Wayne State Univ, Hutzel Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Michigan State Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Individualized growth assessment; pregnancy; Rossavik models; size standards; FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE; CUSTOMIZED BIRTH-WEIGHT; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; SONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS; ULTRASOUND ESTIMATION; 3RD-TRIMESTER GROWTH; RESTRICTED INFANTS; CURVE STANDARDS; FEMUR LENGTH; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2014.934218
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To define modified Prenatal Growth Assessment Scores (mPGAS) for single and composite biometric parameters and determine their reference ranges in normal fetuses. Methods: Nine anatomical parameters (ap) were measured and the weight estimated (EWTa, EWTb) in a longitudinal study of 119 fetuses with normal neonatal growth outcomes. Expected third trimester size trajectories, obtained from second trimester Rossavik size models, were used in calculating Percent Deviations (% Dev's) and their age-specific reference ranges in each fetus. The components of individual % Dev's values outside their reference ranges, designated +iapPGAS, -iapPGAS, were averaged to give +apPGAS and -apPGAS values for the 3rd trimester. The +iapPGAS and -iapPGAS values for different combinations of ap (c1a (HC, AC, FDL, ThC, EWTa), c1b (NC, AC, FDL, ThC, EWTb), c2 (ThC, ArmC, AVol, TVol), c3 (NC, AC, FDL, EWTa)) were then averaged to give +icPGAS and -icPGAS values at different time points or at the end of the third trimester (+cPGAS, -cPGAS). Values for iapPGAS, ic1bPGAS, and ic2PGAS were compared to their respective apPGAS or cPGAS reference ranges. Results: All mPGAS values had one 95% range boundary at 0.0%. Upper boundaries of 1D +apPGAS values ranged from 0.0% (HC) to +0.49% (ThC) and were +0.06%, +2.3% and +1.8% for EWT, AVol and TVol, respectively. Comparable values for apPGAS were 0.0% (BPD, FDL, HDL), to -0.58% (ArmC), -0.13% (EWT), -0.8% (AVol), and 0.0% (TVol). The +cPGAS, 95% reference range upper boundaries varied from +0.36% (c1b) to +0.89% (c2). Comparable values for cPGAS lower boundaries were -0.17% (c1b) to -0.43% (c2). Conclusions: The original PGAS concept has now been extended to individual biometric parameters and their combinations. With the standards provided, mPGAS values can now be tested to see if detection of different types of third trimester growth problems is improved.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 754
页数:10
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]  
al Riyami N, 2011, J OBSTET GYNAECOL CA, V33, P715, DOI 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34956-8
[2]  
ARIYUKI Y, 1995, PEDIATRICS, V96, P36
[3]   The Role of Growth Trajectories in Classifying Fetal Growth Restriction [J].
Barker, Edward D. ;
McAuliffe, Fionnuala M. ;
Alderdice, Fiona ;
Unterscheider, Julia ;
Daly, Sean ;
Geary, Michael P. ;
Kennelly, Mairead M. ;
O'Donoghue, Keelin ;
Hunter, Alyson ;
Morrison, John J. ;
Burke, Gerard ;
Dicker, Patrick ;
Tully, Elizabeth C. ;
Malone, Fergal D. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (02) :248-254
[4]   Fetal growth restriction due to placental disease [J].
Baschat, AA ;
Hecher, K .
SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2004, 28 (01) :67-80
[5]   Fetal responses to placental insufficiency: an update [J].
Baschat, AA .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (10) :1031-1041
[6]   Pathophysiology of fetal growth restriction: Implications for diagnosis and surveillance [J].
Baschat, AA .
OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2004, 59 (08) :617-627
[7]   Accuracy of Different Equations for Estimating Fetal Weight [J].
Benavides-Serralde, Andres ;
Hernandez-Andrade, Edgar ;
Fernandez-Lara, Alfredo ;
Figueras, Francesc ;
Moreno-Alvarez, Oscar ;
Camargo-Marin, Lisbeth ;
Acevedo-Gallegos, Sandra ;
Gallardo-Gaona, Juan ;
Velazquez-Torres, Berenice .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2011, 72 (04) :264-268
[8]  
Bernstein I M, 1996, J Matern Fetal Med, V5, P124
[9]   Prediction and perinatal outcomes of fetal growth restriction [J].
Breeze, Andrew C. G. ;
Lees, Christoph C. .
SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2007, 12 (05) :383-397
[10]   Individualized norms of optimal fetal growth - Fetal growth potential [J].
Bukowski, Radek ;
Uchida, Tatsuo ;
Smith, Gordon C. S. ;
Malone, Fergal D. ;
Ball, Robert H. ;
Nyberg, David A. ;
Comstock, Christine H. ;
Hankins, Gary D. V. ;
Berkowitz, Richard L. ;
Gross, Susan J. ;
Dugoff, Lorraine ;
Craigo, Sabrina D. ;
Timor, Ilan E. ;
Carr, Stephen R. ;
Wolfe, Honor M. ;
D'Alton, Mary E. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (05) :1065-1076