Medical versus surgical abortion

被引:14
|
作者
Cabezas, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Eusebio Hernandez Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, J Grupo Nacl Ginecobstet, Havana, Cuba
关键词
mifepristone; misoprostol; medical abortion; safety;
D O I
10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00196-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of an oral drug regimen of medical abortion compared with surgical abortion. Materials and methods. 500 women with amenorrhea < 56 days chose either surgical abortion or 600 mg of mifepristone (RU-486) followed by 400 mu g of misoprostol after 48 h. Results: Medical regimen had more side effects than surgical abortion, including bleeding, cramping, nausea and vomiting. Only fever was more frequent in the surgical method. The failure rates for medical abortion exceeded those for surgical abortion, 16.0% vs. 4.0%. The adolescents' failure rate in the medical regimen group was only 1.7%. Several failures on medical abortion were not true drug failures, but surgical interventions not medically necessary (misdiagnosis). Women were satisfied with either method, but more preferred medical abortion. Conclusion: Medical methods are safe, effective, simpler and potentially allow greater privacy than surgical abortion methods. Therefore, medical methods could be the method of choice for abortion, particularly for adolescents. (C) 1999 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
引用
收藏
页码:S141 / S146
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Verifying the effectiveness of medical abortion; ultrasound versus hCG testing
    Fiala, C
    Safar, P
    Bygdeman, M
    Gemzell-Danielsson, K
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2003, 109 (02): : 190 - 195
  • [22] Medical versus surgical treatment of first trimester spontaneous abortion: A cost-minimization analysis
    Cubo Nava, Ana
    Soto Pino, Zandra M.
    Haro Perez, Ana M.
    Hernandez Hernandez, M. Estrella
    Doyague Sanchez, M. Jose
    Sayagues Manzano, Jose M.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [23] Economic evaluation of medical versus surgical strategies for first trimester therapeutic abortion: A systematic review
    Barghazan, Saeed Husseini
    Hadian, Mohamad
    Rezapour, Aziz
    Nassiri, Setare
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2022, 11 (01) : 184
  • [24] The influence of medical abortion compared with surgical abortion on subsequent pregnancy outcome
    Gan, Changping
    Zou, Yan
    Wu, Shangchun
    Li, Youping
    Liu, Qing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2008, 101 (03) : 231 - 238
  • [25] Psychiatric outcomes following medical and surgical abortion
    Sit, Dorothy
    Rothschild, Anthony J.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    Hanusa, Barbara H.
    Wisner, Katherine L.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (03) : 878 - 884
  • [26] Safety, efficacy, and acceptability of medical abortion in China, Cuba, and India: A comparative trial of mifepristone-misoprostol versus surgical abortion
    Winikoff, B
    Sivin, I
    Coyaji, KJ
    Cabezas, E
    Xiao, BL
    Gu, SJ
    Du, MK
    Krishna, UR
    Eschen, A
    Ellertson, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 176 (02) : 431 - 437
  • [27] Self administration versus supervised use of Medical Abortion pills: Impact on women's health
    Agarwal, Neelima
    Gupta, Manisha
    Agrawal, Alpana
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL NEGATIVE RESULTS, 2022, 13 : 475 - 482
  • [28] Medical Compared With Surgical Abortion for Effective Pregnancy Termination in the First Trimester
    Ireland, Luu Doan
    Gatter, Mary
    Chen, Angela Y.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [29] Surgical abortion
    Flett, GMM
    Templeton, A
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02) : 247 - 261
  • [30] Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation
    Ashok, PW
    Hamoda, H
    Flett, GMM
    Kidd, A
    Fitzmaurice, A
    Templeton, A
    CONTRACEPTION, 2005, 71 (02) : 143 - 148