Medical versus surgical abortion

被引:14
|
作者
Cabezas, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Eusebio Hernandez Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, J Grupo Nacl Ginecobstet, Havana, Cuba
关键词
mifepristone; misoprostol; medical abortion; safety;
D O I
10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00196-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of an oral drug regimen of medical abortion compared with surgical abortion. Materials and methods. 500 women with amenorrhea < 56 days chose either surgical abortion or 600 mg of mifepristone (RU-486) followed by 400 mu g of misoprostol after 48 h. Results: Medical regimen had more side effects than surgical abortion, including bleeding, cramping, nausea and vomiting. Only fever was more frequent in the surgical method. The failure rates for medical abortion exceeded those for surgical abortion, 16.0% vs. 4.0%. The adolescents' failure rate in the medical regimen group was only 1.7%. Several failures on medical abortion were not true drug failures, but surgical interventions not medically necessary (misdiagnosis). Women were satisfied with either method, but more preferred medical abortion. Conclusion: Medical methods are safe, effective, simpler and potentially allow greater privacy than surgical abortion methods. Therefore, medical methods could be the method of choice for abortion, particularly for adolescents. (C) 1999 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
引用
收藏
页码:S141 / S146
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] "In patient" medical abortion versus surgical abortion: patient's satisfaction
    Di Carlo, Costantino
    Savoia, Fabiana
    Ferrara, Cinzia
    Sglavo, Gabriella
    Tommaselli, Giovanni Antonio
    Giampaolino, Pierluigi
    Cagnacci, Angelo
    Nappi, Carmine
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 (08) : 650 - 654
  • [2] Patients' Motivation for Surgical Versus Medical Abortion
    Murray, Marie-Eve
    Casson, Margaret
    Pudwell, Jessica
    Waddington, Ashley
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2019, 41 (09) : 1325 - 1329
  • [3] Medical versus Surgical Abortion Methods for Pregnancy in China: A Cost-Minimization Analysis
    Xia, Wei
    She, Shouzhang
    Lam, Tai Hing
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2011, 72 (04) : 257 - 263
  • [4] Randomized comparison of efficacy, acceptability and cost of medical versus surgical abortion
    Creinin, MD
    CONTRACEPTION, 2000, 62 (03) : 117 - 124
  • [5] Service users' attributes associated with the uptake of medical versus surgical abortion at public health facilities in Vietnam
    Ngo, Thoai D.
    Free, Caroline
    Le, Hoan T.
    Edwards, Phil
    Pham, Kiet H. T.
    Nguyen, Yen B. T.
    Nguyen, Thang H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 125 (03) : 247 - 252
  • [6] Medical and surgical options for induced abortion in first trimester
    Hamoda, Haitham
    Templeton, Allan
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 503 - 516
  • [7] Medical abortion by mifepristone with oral versus vaginal misoprostol
    Jyothi, Shetty
    Pallavi, M. N. V.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2006, 56 (06) : 529 - 531
  • [8] How do women seeking abortion choose between surgical and medical abortion? Perspectives from abortion service providers
    Newton, Danielle
    Bayly, Chris
    McNamee, Kathleen
    Hardiman, Annarella
    Bismark, Marie
    Webster, Amy
    Keogh, Louise
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 56 (05) : 523 - 529
  • [9] Endometrial thickness following medical abortion is not predictive of subsequent surgical intervention
    Reeves, M. F.
    Fox, M. C.
    Lohr, P. A.
    Creinin, M. D.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 34 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [10] Voluntary termination of pregnancy (medical or surgical abortion): forensic medicine issues
    Piras, Mauro
    Delbon, Paola
    Bin, Paola
    Casella, Claudia
    Capasso, Emanuele
    Niola, Massimo
    Conti, Adelaide
    OPEN MEDICINE, 2016, 11 (01): : 321 - 326