Satisfaction of switching to combination therapy with lixisenatide and basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injection therapy: A randomized controlled trial

被引:24
|
作者
Miya, Aika [1 ,2 ]
Nakamura, Akinobu [1 ]
Miyoshi, Hideaki [1 ]
Cho, Kyu Yong [1 ]
Nagai, So [3 ]
Kurihara, Yoshio [4 ]
Aoki, Shin [5 ]
Taguri, Masataka [6 ]
Terauchi, Yasuo [7 ]
Atsumi, Tatsuya [1 ]
机构
[1] Hokkaido Univ, Div Rheumatol Endocrinol & Nephrol, Grad Sch Med, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[2] Kushiro Red Cross Hosp, Kushiro, Hokkaido, Japan
[3] Sapporo Med Ctr NTT EC, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[4] Kurihara Clin, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[5] Aoki Clin, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[6] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Biostat, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[7] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Grad Sch Med, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
Lixisenatide; Treatment satisfaction; Type; 2; diabetes; RECEPTOR AGONIST LIXISENATIDE; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDE-1; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DOUBLE-BLIND; GLP-1; ANALOG; LIRAGLUTIDE; EFFICACY; WEIGHT; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/jdi.12654
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims/IntroductionWe compared the satisfaction levels of patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing combination therapy with lixisenatide (LIX) and basal insulin with that of patients undergoing multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) therapy. Materials and MethodsThe study was a 12-week open-label, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial. Participants were Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes receiving MDI for >3 months. Patients were randomly assigned to each treatment cohort: (i) a group that continued MDI (MDI group); and (ii) a group that switched from MDI to combination therapy with LIX and basal insulin (LIX group). The primary outcome was change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores from baseline to 12 weeks between these two groups. Key secondary outcomes were glycated hemoglobin and body weight changes. ResultsA total of 31 patients were initially enrolled in the study, and 26 of them completed the study. The change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores in the LIX group was significantly greater compared with that in the MDI group. Mean changes in glycated hemoglobin levels were -0.05 0.37% in the MDI group and 0.04 +/- 0.38% in the LIX group (P = 0.36). Mean changes in body weight were +0.6 +/- 1.8 kg in the MDI group and -2.5 +/- 1.8 kg in the LIX group (P < 0.01). ConclusionsSwitching from MDI to combination therapy with LIX and basal insulin improved satisfaction levels while maintaining glycemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 126
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Options for Intensifying a Basal Insulin Therapy in Humans with Type 2 Diabetes
    Gallwitz, B.
    Matthaei, S.
    DIABETOLOGIE UND STOFFWECHSEL, 2015, 10 (03) : 129 - 140
  • [32] Contribution of glimepiride to basal-prandial insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Yokoyama, Hiroki
    Sone, Hirohito
    Yamada, Daishiro
    Honjo, Jun
    Haneda, Masakazu
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 91 (02) : 148 - 153
  • [33] The contribution of metformin to glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving combination therapy with insulin
    Tong, PC
    Chow, CC
    Jorgensen, LN
    Cockram, CS
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2002, 57 (02) : 93 - 98
  • [34] Switching the basal insulin to insulin glargine 300 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes under basal insulin supported oral therapy: Observational trial on effectiveness and safety
    Seufert, Jochen
    Wiesli, Peter
    Fritsche, Andreas
    Anderten, Helmut
    Pegelow, Katrin
    Pscherer, Stefan
    Pfohl, Martin
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2022, 24 (01) : 72 - 81
  • [35] Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed-ratio combination (iGlarLixi) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs: The LixiLan JP-L randomized clinical trial
    Kaneto, Hideaki
    Takami, Akane
    Spranger, Robert
    Amano, Atsushi
    Watanabe, Daisuke
    Niemoeller, Elisabeth
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2020, 22 : 3 - 13
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness of once daily GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide compared to bolus insulin both in combination with basal insulin for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes in Norway
    Huetson, Pernilla
    Palmer, James L.
    Levorsen, Andree
    Fournier, Marie
    Germe, Maeva
    McLeod, Euan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 18 (08) : 573 - 585
  • [37] Switching to basal-bolus insulin therapy is effective and safe in long-term type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled with other insulin regimens
    Vinagre, Irene
    Sanchez-Hernandez, Juan
    Luis Sanchez-Quesada, Jose
    Angel Maria, Miguel
    de Leiva, Alberto
    Peres, Antonio
    ENDOCRINOLOGIA Y NUTRICION, 2013, 60 (05): : 249 - 253
  • [38] Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Duration on the Efficacy and Safety of Add-on Lixisenatide in Asian Individuals Receiving Basal Insulin: A Pooled Analysis
    Yao, Jun
    Zhang, Minlu
    Zhang, Xia
    Zhang, Junqing
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2023, 14 (04) : 653 - 669
  • [39] Once-daily prandial lixisenatide versus once-daily rapid-acting insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus insufficiently controlled with basal insulin: analysis of data from five randomized, controlled trials
    Raccah, Denis
    Lin, Jay
    Wang, Edward
    Germe, Maeva
    Perfetti, Riccardo
    Bonadonna, Riccardo C.
    de Pablos-Velasco, Pedro
    Roussel, Ronan
    Rosenstock, Julio
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2014, 28 (01) : 40 - 44
  • [40] Clinical Characteristics and Glycemic Outcomes of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Requiring Maximum Dose Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed-Ratio Combination or Insulin Glargine in the LixiLan-L Trial
    Blonde, Lawrence
    Bailey, Timothy S.
    Chao, Jason
    Dex, Terry A.
    Frias, Juan Pablo
    Meneghini, Luigi F.
    Roberts, Michelle
    Aroda, Vanita R.
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2019, 36 (09) : 2310 - 2326