Twenty years of experience with less radical fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: Oncological outcomes

被引:12
|
作者
Hruda, Martin [1 ,4 ]
Robova, Helena [1 ]
Rob, Lukas [1 ]
Halaska, Michael J. [1 ]
Drozenova, Jana [2 ]
Pichlik, Tomas [1 ]
Malikova, Hana [3 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Med Fac 3, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Ruska 84, Prague 10034 10, Czech Republic
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Dept Pathol, Med Fac 3, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Dept Radiol, Med Fac 3, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med Plzen, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
Cervical cancer; Less radical fertility-sparing surgery; Oncological outcomes; Sentinel lymph node mapping; VAGINAL TRACHELECTOMY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; CONIZATION; CARCINOMA; THERAPY; SERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.031
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction. The standard procedure in cervical cancer is radical hysterectomy (RH) and pelvic lymphade-nectomy (PLND). Because of the increasing age of women at childbirth, fertility becomes a major challenge. We present 20 years of experience with two-step less radical fertility-sparing surgery in women with IA1, LVSI positive, IA2 and IB1 (<2 cm, infiltration less than half of stromal invasions. Materials and method. Preoperative workout consisted of histopathological diagnosis and magnetic resonance imaging along with ultrasonographic volumetry. We then performed laparoscopic sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) with frozen section (FS) followed by PLND and "selective parametrectomy" (removal of afferent lym-phatic channels from the paracervix) in case of a negative result. If verified by definitive histopathology, patients were treated by simple trachelectomy (IB1) or large cone (IA1/IA2) biopsy 1 week after primary surgery. Results. From 1999 to 2018, 91 women were enrolled in the study (median age 29.1 years, range 21-40). Of these 91 women, 51 (56.0%) were nulliparous. The detection rate of SLNs was 100% per patient and the specific side detection rate 96.7%. Positive lymph nodes were diagnosed in nine cases (9.8%). These women then underwent RH. Fertility was spared in 80 women but 4 recurred locally (5.0%). The mortality rate was 0.0%. The median follow-up was 149 months. Conclusion. Less radical fertility-sparing surgery with SLNM is safe in cervical cancers <2 cm at the largest di-ameter and infiltrating less than half of the cervical stroma. The recurrence rate is acceptable with no mortality. Morbidity with this procedure is low. Extended and accurate follow-up is necessary and human papillomavirus - high risk (HPV-HR tests seem to be useful in such follow-up assessment. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 104
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: does surgical approach have an impact on disease outcomes?
    Bixel, Kristin L.
    Fowler, Jeffrey M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (05) : 417 - 419
  • [32] Outcomes of laparoscopic fertility-sparing surgery in clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer
    Park, Jin-Young
    Heo, Eun Jin
    Lee, Jeong-Won
    Lee, Yoo-Young
    Kim, Tae-Joong
    Kim, Byoung-Gie
    Bae, Duk-Soo
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (02)
  • [33] Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer ≥ 2 cm: A Problem with a Thousand Nuances—A Systematic Review of Oncological Outcomes
    Carlo Ronsini
    Maria Cristina Solazzo
    Nicolò Bizzarri
    Domenico Ambrosio
    Marco La Verde
    Marco Torella
    Raffaela Maria Carotenuto
    Luigi Cobellis
    Nicola Colacurci
    Pasquale De Franciscis
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 8346 - 8358
  • [34] Results of less radical fertility-sparing procedures with omitted parametrectomy for cervical cancer: 5 years of experience
    Slama, Jiri
    Cerny, Andrej
    Dusek, Ladislav
    Fischerova, Daniela
    Zikan, Michal
    Kocian, Roman
    Germanova, Anna
    Cibula, David
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 142 (03) : 401 - 404
  • [35] Robotic fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer
    Azais, Henri
    Koual, Meriem
    Nguyen-Xuan, Huyen-Thu
    Achen, Guillaume
    Bentivegna, Enrica
    Bats, Anne-Sophie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 (02) : 207 - 208
  • [36] DISPARITIES IN THE USE OF FERTILITY-SPARING SURGERY FOR EARLY STAGE CERVICAL CANCER
    Nasioudis, D.
    Rubin, E.
    Kim, S.
    Cameron, K. E.
    Ko, E. M.
    Latif, N. A.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : E175 - E176
  • [37] FERTILITY-SPARING RADICAL TRACHELECTOMY FOR EARLY-STAGE CERVICAL CANCER: 12 CASES SERIES AND LITERATURE REVIEW
    Doan, Nghia Trong
    Nguyen, Tien Van
    Ta, Lieu Thanh
    Luong, Lap Chan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 : A3 - A3
  • [38] Is it time to broaden the scope of fertility-sparing treatments for early-stage cervical cancer?
    Mari-Alexandre, Josep
    Gilabert-Estelles, Juan
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 115 (01) : 81 - 82
  • [39] ASO Author Reflection: Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer—What Perspectives Between Oncological Prognosis and Obstetrical Future?
    Henri Azaïs
    Geoffroy Canlorbe
    Catherine Uzan
    Jérémie Belghiti
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 681 - 682
  • [40] Fertility-sparing trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A proposal of an ideal candidate
    Machida, Hiroko
    Iwata, Takashi
    Okugawa, Kaoru
    Matsuo, Koji
    Saito, Tsuyoshi
    Tanaka, Kyoko
    Morishige, Kenichiro
    Kobayashi, Hiroaki
    Yoshino, Kiyoshi
    Tokunaga, Hideki
    Ikeda, Tomoaki
    Shozu, Makio
    Yaegashi, Nobuo
    Enomoto, Takayuki
    Mikami, Mikio
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 156 (02) : 341 - 348