Fetal thermal effects of diagnostic ultrasound

被引:72
作者
Abramowicz, Jacques S. [1 ]
Barnett, Stanley B. [2 ]
Duck, Francis A. [3 ,4 ]
Edmonds, Peter D. [5 ]
Hynynen, Kullervo H. [7 ]
Ziskin, Marvin C. [6 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[4] Royal United Hosp, Bath BA1 3NG, Avon, England
[5] SRI Int, Mol Phys Lab, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[6] Temple Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Biomed Phys, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
bioeffects; fetus; obstetrics; safety; thermal effects; ultrasound;
D O I
10.7863/jum.2008.27.4.541
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Processes that can produce a biological effect with some degree of heating (ie, about 1 degrees C above the physiologic temperature) act via a thermal mechanism. Investigations with laboratory animals have documented that pulsed ultrasound can produce elevations of temperature and damage in biological tissues in vivo, particularly in the presence of bone (intracranial temperature elevation). Acoustic outputs used to induce these adverse bioeffects are within the diagnostic range, although exposure times are usually considerably longer than in clinical practice. Conditions present in early pregnancy, such as lack of perfusion, may favor bioeffects. Thermally induced teratogenesis has been shown in many animal studies, as well as several controlled human studies; however, human studies have not shown a causal relationship between diagnostic ultrasound exposure during pregnancy and adverse biological effects to the fetus. All human epidemiologic studies, however, were conducted with commercially available devices predating 1992, that is, with acoustic outputs not exceeding a spatial-peak temporal-average intensity of 94 mW/cm(2). Current limits in the United States allow a spatial-peak temporal-average intensity of 720 mW/cm(2) for fetal applications. The synergistic effect of a raised body temperature (febrile status) and ultrasound insonation has not been examined in depth. Available evidence, experimental or epidemiologic, is insufficient to conclude that there is a causal relationship between obstetric diagnostic ultrasound exposure and obvious adverse thermal effects to the fetus. However, very subtle effects cannot be ruled out and indicate a need for further research, although research in humans may be extremely difficult to realize.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 559
页数:19
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [1] ABART J, 1989, INT SOC MAGN RES MED, P998
  • [2] TEMPERATURE ELEVATION IN THE RAT FETUS DUE TO ULTRASOUND EXPOSURE
    ABRAHAM, V
    ZISKIN, MC
    HEYNER, S
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1989, 15 (05) : 443 - 449
  • [3] Conclusions regarding epidemiology for obstetric ultrasound
    Abramovvicz, Jacques S.
    Fowlkes, J. Brian
    Skelly, Andrea C.
    Stratmeyer, Melvin E.
    Ziskin, Marvin C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (04) : 637 - 644
  • [4] Ultrasonographic contrast media - Has the time come in obstetrics and gynecology?
    Abramowicz, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (04) : 517 - 531
  • [5] Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology - Is this hot technology too hot?
    Abramowicz, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (12) : 1327 - 1333
  • [6] *AM C GOV IND HYG, 1983, THRESH LIM VAL CHEM
  • [7] *AM I ULTR MED NAT, 2001, STAND REALTIME DISPL
  • [8] EFFECTS OF PULSED ULTRASOUND AND TEMPERATURE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF RAT EMBRYOS IN CULTURE
    ANGLES, JM
    WALSH, DA
    LI, K
    BARNETT, SB
    EDWARDS, MJ
    [J]. TERATOLOGY, 1990, 42 (03) : 285 - 293
  • [9] Asakura Hirobumi, 2004, Journal of Nippon Medical School, V71, P360, DOI 10.1272/jnms.71.360
  • [10] Atkins T J, 2003, Eur J Ultrasound, V16, P243, DOI 10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00079-4