Quality initiative to improve emergency department sepsis bundle compliance through utilisation of an electronic health record tool

被引:5
作者
Warstadt, Nicholus Michael [1 ]
Caldwell, J. Reed [1 ]
Tang, Nicole [1 ]
Mandola, Staci [1 ]
Jamin, Catherine [1 ,2 ]
Dahn, Cassidy [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Ronald O Perelman Dept Emergency Med, Grossman Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Divison Crit Care Med, Grossman Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
quality improvement; critical care; emergency department; standards of care; decision support; computerised; GOAL-DIRECTED THERAPY; SEPTIC SHOCK; TIME; IMPACT; RESUSCITATION; DEFINITIONS; ANTIBIOTICS; CARE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001624
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Sepsis is a common cause of emergency department (ED) presentation and hospital admission, accounting for a disproportionate number of deaths each year relative to its incidence. Sepsis outcomes have improved with increased recognition and treatment standards promoted by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Due to delay in recognition and other barriers, sepsis bundle compliance remains low nationally. We hypothesised that a targeted education intervention regarding use of an electronic health record (EHR) tool for identification and management of sepsis would lead to increased EHR tool utilisation and increased sepsis bundle compliance. Methods We created a multidisciplinary quality improvement team to provide training and feedback on EHR tool utilisation within our ED. A prospective evaluation of the rate of EHR tool utilisation was monitored from June through December 2020. Simultaneously, we conducted two retrospective cohort studies comparing overall sepsis bundle compliance for patients when EHR tool was used versus not used. The first cohort was all patients with intention-to-treat for any sepsis severity. The second cohort of patients included adult patients with time of recognition of sepsis in the ED admitted with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. Results EHR tool utilisation increased from 23.3% baseline prior to intervention to 87.2% during the study. In the intention-to-treat cohort, there was a statistically significant difference in compliance between EHR tool utilisation versus no utilisation in overall bundle compliance (p<0.001) and for several individual components: initial lactate (p=0.009), repeat lactate (p=0.001), timely antibiotics (p=0.031), blood cultures before antibiotics (p=0.001), initial fluid bolus (p<0.001) and fluid reassessment (p<0.001). In the severe sepsis and septic shock cohort, EHR tool use increased from 71.2% pre-intervention to 85.0% post-intervention (p=0.008). Conclusion With training, feedback and EHR optimisation, an EHR tool can be successfully integrated into current workflows and appears to increase sepsis bundle compliance.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   The impact of a multifaceted intervention including sepsis electronic alert system and sepsis response team on the outcomes of patients with sepsis and septic shock [J].
Arabi, Yaseen M. ;
Al-Dorzi, Hasan M. ;
Alamry, Ahmed ;
Hijazi, Ra'ed ;
Alsolamy, Sami ;
Al Salamah, Majid ;
Tamim, Hani M. ;
Al-Qahtani, Saad ;
Al-Dawood, Abdulaziz ;
Marini, Abdellatif M. ;
Al Ehnidi, Fatimah H. ;
Mundekkadan, Shihab ;
Matroud, Amal ;
Mohamed, S. Mohamed ;
Taher, Saadi .
ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2017, 7
[2]   IMPACT OF NURSE-INITIATED ED SEPSIS PROTOCOL ON COMPLIANCE WITH SEPSIS BUNDLES, TIME TO INITIAL ANTIBIOTIC ADMINISTRATION, AND IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY [J].
Bruce, Heather Rose ;
Maiden, Jeanne ;
Fedullo, Peter F. ;
Kim, Son Chae .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING, 2015, 41 (02) :130-137
[3]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, CLIN INF SEPS
[4]   Impact of Electronic Physician Order-Set on Antibiotic Ordering Time in Septic Patients in the Emergency Department [J].
Fargo, Emily L. ;
D'Amico, Frank ;
Pickering, Aaron ;
Fowler, Kathleen ;
Campbell, Ronald ;
Baumgartner, Megan .
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 9 (04) :869-874
[5]  
Ferguson A, 2019, AM J NURS, V119, P52, DOI 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000552614.89028.d6
[6]   Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department [J].
Gaieski, David F. ;
Mikkelsen, Mark E. ;
Band, Roger A. ;
Pines, Jesse M. ;
Massone, Richard ;
Furia, Frances F. ;
Shofer, Frances S. ;
Goyal, Munish .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (04) :1045-1053
[7]   A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department [J].
Gatewood, Medley O'Keefe ;
Wemple, Matthew ;
Greco, Sheryl ;
Kritek, Patricia A. ;
Durvasula, Raghu .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2015, 24 (12) :787-795
[8]   Managing sepsis: Electronic recognition, rapid response teams, and standardized care save lives [J].
Guirgis, Faheem W. ;
Jones, Lisa ;
Esma, Rhemar ;
Weiss, Alice ;
McCurdy, Kaitlin ;
Ferreira, Jason ;
Cannon, Christina ;
McLauchlin, Laura ;
Smotherman, Carmen ;
Kraemer, Dale F. ;
Gerdik, Cynthia ;
Webb, Kendall ;
Ra, Jin ;
Moore, Frederick A. ;
Gray-Eurom, Kelly .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 40 :296-302
[9]   Interventions to Improve the Timeliness of Emergency Care [J].
Handel, Daniel ;
Epstein, Stephen ;
Khare, Rahul ;
Abernethy, Denise ;
Klauer, Kevin ;
Pilgrim, Randy ;
Soremekun, Olan ;
Sayan, Osman .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 18 (12) :1295-1302
[10]   Triage sepsis alert and sepsis protocol lower times to fluids and antibiotics in the ED [J].
Hayden, Geoffrey E. ;
Tuuri, Rachel E. ;
Scott, Rachel ;
Losek, Joseph D. ;
Blackshaw, Aaron M. ;
Schoenling, Andrew J. ;
Nietert, Paul J. ;
Hall, Greg A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (01) :1-9