Challenges of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Novel Therapeutics for Inherited Retinal Diseases

被引:11
|
作者
Jayasundera, K. Thiran [1 ]
Abuzaitoun, Rebhi O. [1 ]
Lacy, Gabrielle D. [1 ]
Abalem, Maria Fernanda [1 ,2 ]
Saltzman, Gregory M. [3 ,4 ]
Ciulla, Thomas A. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Johnson, Mark W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Kellogg Eye Ctr, Med Sch, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Med Sch, Dept Ophthalmol & Otolaryngol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Albion Coll, Dept Econ & Management, Albion, MI 49224 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Eugene & Marilyn Glick Eye Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[6] Clearside Biomed Inc, Alpharetta, GA USA
[7] Midwest Eye Inst, Retina Serv, Carmel, IN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREFERENCE-BASED INDEX; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; VISION; UTILITY; DEGENERATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2021.08.009
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
center dot PURPOSE: To investigate the challenges and potential improvement strategies of cost-effectiveness analyses performed for therapeutics targeting inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). center dot DESIGN: Perspective. center dot METHODS: A literature review was conducted with discussion of current limitations and improvement recommendations. center dot RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) performed for IRD therapeutics has multiple limitations. First, the available methods used to measure health-related quality of life and health utilities can be inaccurate when used in IRDs. Second, the financial burden to patients and society from vision impairment associated with IRDs has been inadequately studied and includes a variety of expenditures ranging from direct costs of IRD specialty health care to indirect expenses associated with daily living activities. Third, our collective understanding is limited in the areas of IRD natural history and health benefits gained from new IRD treatments (eg, gene therapies). In addition, the therapeutic effect from a patient perspective and its duration of action are not fully understood. Due to the scarcity of data, CEA for newly approved therapies has relied on assumptions and creations of predictive models for both costs and health benefits for these new therapeutics in order to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. center dot CONCLUSIONS: CEA studies performed for IRD therapeutics have been limited by the established health utilities in ophthalmology and the lack of disease-specific information. The assumptions and extrapolations in these studies create substantial uncertainty in incremental costeffectiveness ratio results. An improved framework is required for CEA of IRD therapeutics in order to determine the cost-effectiveness of each therapy brought from clinical trials to clinical practice. (Am J Ophthalmol 2022;235: 90-97. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 97
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The (near)equivalence of cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses - Fact or fallacy?
    Donaldson, C
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1998, 13 (04) : 389 - 396
  • [32] A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment
    Yuen, Sydney C.
    Amaefule, Adaeze Q.
    Kim, Hannah H.
    Owoo, Breanna-Verissa
    Gorman, Emily F.
    Mattingly, T. Joseph I. I. I. I.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS-OPEN, 2022, 6 (01) : 9 - 19
  • [33] A Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses for Open Angle Glaucoma Management
    Sood, Shefali
    Iskander, Mina
    Heilenbach, Noah
    Chen, Dinah
    Al-Aswad, Lama A.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2023, 32 (08) : 619 - 630
  • [34] A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Drugs for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
    Mickaël Hiligsmann
    Silvia M. Evers
    Wafa Ben Sedrine
    John A. Kanis
    Bram Ramaekers
    Jean-Yves Reginster
    Stuart Silverman
    Caroline E. Wyers
    Annelies Boonen
    PharmacoEconomics, 2015, 33 : 205 - 224
  • [35] Future Costs in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: Past, Present, Future
    de Vries, Linda M.
    van Baal, Pieter H. M.
    Brouwer, Werner B. F.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2019, 37 (02) : 119 - 130
  • [36] Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review of Modelling Approaches
    Guo, Shien
    Pelligra, Christopher
    Thibault, Catherine Saint-Laurent
    Hernandez, Luis
    Kansal, Anuraag
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (06) : 559 - 572
  • [37] Incorporating adherence in cost-effectiveness analyses of asthma: a systematic review
    Chongmelaxme, Bunchai
    Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
    Dilokthornsakul, Piyameth
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 22 (06) : 554 - 566
  • [38] Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analyses of Pneumococcal Vaccination in Indonesia
    Suwantika, Auliya A.
    Zakiyah, Neily
    Abdulah, Rizky
    Sitohang, Vensya
    Tandy, Gertrudis
    Anartati, Atiek
    Hidayatullah, Tetrawindu
    Herliana, Putri
    Hadinegoro, Sri R.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 2021
  • [39] Evidence-Based Medicine in Otolaryngology Part 10: Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in Otolaryngology
    Caulley, Lisa
    Rodin, Danielle
    Kilty, Shaun
    Randolph, Gregory
    Hunink, Myriam G.
    Shin, Jennifer J.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2019, 161 (03) : 375 - 387
  • [40] Applying utility values in cost-effectiveness analyses of lung cancer screening: A review of methods
    Ngo, Preston J.
    Cressman, Sonya
    Behar-Harpaz, Silvia
    Karikios, Deme J.
    Canfell, Karen
    Weber, Marianne F.
    LUNG CANCER, 2022, 166 : 122 - 131