Challenges of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Novel Therapeutics for Inherited Retinal Diseases

被引:11
|
作者
Jayasundera, K. Thiran [1 ]
Abuzaitoun, Rebhi O. [1 ]
Lacy, Gabrielle D. [1 ]
Abalem, Maria Fernanda [1 ,2 ]
Saltzman, Gregory M. [3 ,4 ]
Ciulla, Thomas A. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Johnson, Mark W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Kellogg Eye Ctr, Med Sch, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Med Sch, Dept Ophthalmol & Otolaryngol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Albion Coll, Dept Econ & Management, Albion, MI 49224 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Eugene & Marilyn Glick Eye Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[6] Clearside Biomed Inc, Alpharetta, GA USA
[7] Midwest Eye Inst, Retina Serv, Carmel, IN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREFERENCE-BASED INDEX; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; VISION; UTILITY; DEGENERATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2021.08.009
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
center dot PURPOSE: To investigate the challenges and potential improvement strategies of cost-effectiveness analyses performed for therapeutics targeting inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). center dot DESIGN: Perspective. center dot METHODS: A literature review was conducted with discussion of current limitations and improvement recommendations. center dot RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) performed for IRD therapeutics has multiple limitations. First, the available methods used to measure health-related quality of life and health utilities can be inaccurate when used in IRDs. Second, the financial burden to patients and society from vision impairment associated with IRDs has been inadequately studied and includes a variety of expenditures ranging from direct costs of IRD specialty health care to indirect expenses associated with daily living activities. Third, our collective understanding is limited in the areas of IRD natural history and health benefits gained from new IRD treatments (eg, gene therapies). In addition, the therapeutic effect from a patient perspective and its duration of action are not fully understood. Due to the scarcity of data, CEA for newly approved therapies has relied on assumptions and creations of predictive models for both costs and health benefits for these new therapeutics in order to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. center dot CONCLUSIONS: CEA studies performed for IRD therapeutics have been limited by the established health utilities in ophthalmology and the lack of disease-specific information. The assumptions and extrapolations in these studies create substantial uncertainty in incremental costeffectiveness ratio results. An improved framework is required for CEA of IRD therapeutics in order to determine the cost-effectiveness of each therapy brought from clinical trials to clinical practice. (Am J Ophthalmol 2022;235: 90-97. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 97
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness analyses of denosumab for osteoporosis: a systematic review
    Wan, Y.
    Zeng, F.
    Tan, H.
    Lu, Y.
    Zhang, Y.
    Zhao, L.
    You, R.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 33 (05) : 979 - 1015
  • [22] Incorporating Extrinsic Goals Into Decision and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
    Hazen, Gordon B.
    Schwartz, Alan
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2009, 29 (05) : 580 - 589
  • [23] Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
    Sanders, Gillian D.
    Neumann, Peter J.
    Basu, Anirban
    Brock, Dan W.
    Feeny, David
    Krahn, Murray
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    Meltzer, David O.
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Salomon, Joshua A.
    Sculpher, Mark J.
    Trikalinos, Thomas A.
    Russell, Louise B.
    Siegel, Joanna E.
    Ganiats, Theodore G.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (10): : 1093 - 1103
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness analyses of genetic and genomic diagnostic tests
    Payne, Katherine
    Gavan, Sean P.
    Wright, Stuart J.
    Thompson, Alexander J.
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2018, 19 (04) : 235 - +
  • [25] A Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness of Biologics for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
    Huoponen, Saara
    Blom, Marja
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12):
  • [26] The Blunt End: Surgical Challenges of Gene Therapy for Inherited Retinal Diseases
    Davis, Janet L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 196 : XXV - XXIX
  • [27] A critical review of cost-effectiveness analyses of vaccinating males against human papillomavirus
    Jiang, Yiling
    Gauthier, Aline
    Postma, Maarten J.
    Ribassin-Majed, Laureen
    Largeron, Nathalie
    Bresse, Xavier
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2013, 9 (11) : 2285 - 2295
  • [28] Systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
    Ferreira, Joao
    Mirco, Ana
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2015, 34 (03) : 179 - 191
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness of novel therapies for overactive bladder
    Mayr, Craig A.
    Shepherd, Jonathan P.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (04) : 527 - 535
  • [30] Challenges in Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening: The Example of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
    Grosse, Scott D.
    Van Vliet, Guy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEONATAL SCREENING, 2020, 6 (04)