Physicians' preferences for prescribing oral and intravenous anticancer drugs: A Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:35
作者
Benjamin, Laure [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cotte, Francois-Emery [1 ]
Philippe, Caroline [4 ]
Mercier, Florence [5 ]
Bachelot, Thomas [6 ]
Vidal-Trecan, Gwenaelle [2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline Inc, Hlth Outcomes Studies, F-78163 Marly Le Roi, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Epidemiol Evaluat & Polit Sante EA4069, F-75181 Paris 04, France
[3] EHESP, F-35043 Rennes, France
[4] Qualees, F-75009 Paris, France
[5] Stat Proc, F-27940 Port Mort, France
[6] Ctr Leon Berard, INSERM, U950, F-69373 Lyon 08, France
[7] Hop Cochin, AP HP, Grp Hosp Paris Ctr, Unite Sante Publ Gest Risques & Qualite, F-75014 Paris, France
[8] Univ Paris 05, Fac Med, F-75270 Paris 06, France
关键词
Discrete Choice Experiment; Conjoint analysis; Preference; Medical decision-making; Anticancer drugs; Oral chemotherapy; Intravenous chemotherapy; Chemotherapy administration; Reimbursement; HEALTH-CARE; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although efficacy and tolerability are classical criteria for treatment choice, patient adherence and tariff issues related to novel oral anticancer drugs may also influence therapeutic decisions. We estimated the relative influence of efficacy, tolerability, expected adherence and route of administration of a chemotherapy treatment on 203 French physicians' preferences who participated in a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE), a quantitative method used to elicit preferences. From a questionnaire with six scenarii, respondents had to choose between two treatments which differed with respect to these four attributes. Scenarii were first presented in a curative setting then in a palliative setting. Efficacy, tolerability and expected adherence had two modalities (good versus moderate) and route of administration had three modalities (intravenous ((sic)286-379/session), oral with the current tariff ((sic)28/consultation), oral with a hypothetical tariff ((sic)114)). Efficacy was the reference criterion in choosing a treatment whatever the therapeutic goal(beta:2.114, p < 0.0001 in curative setting versus beta: 1.063, p < 0.0001 in palliative setting). The oral route of administration was important but only in a palliative setting (beta: 0.612, p = 0.035, and beta: 0.506, p < 0.0001 for the current and hypothetical tariff, respectively). Removing the efficacy attribute from logistic regression model, tolerability (beta: 1.228, p = 0.0001) and expected adherence (beta: 1.223, p = 0.0001) were influent in curative setting while the route of administration was still predominant in palliative setting (beta: 0.431, p < 0.0001). Results suggest that economic considerations as well as therapeutic efficacy play a significant role in choosing a treatment. Preference for oral chemotherapy with a hypothetical tariff for a patient support programme should be considered for the development of therapeutic education and healthcare coordination, currently not taken into account in the tariff of oral chemotherapy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 920
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Principle, strengths and weaknesses of discrete choice modelling for eliciting public preferences for health care [J].
Berchi, C. ;
Launoy, G. .
REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2007, 55 (02) :133-139
[2]   The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France [J].
Berchi C. ;
Dupuis J.-M. ;
Launoy G. .
The European Journal of Health Economics, 2006, 7 (2) :91-98
[3]   Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Hauber, A. Brett ;
Marshall, Deborah ;
Lloyd, Andrew ;
Prosser, Lisa A. ;
Regier, Dean A. ;
Johnson, F. Reed ;
Mauskopf, Josephine .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) :403-413
[4]   Perception that oral anticancer treatments are less efficacious:: development of a questionnaire to assess the possible prejudices of patients with cancer [J].
Catania, C ;
Didier, F ;
Leon, ME ;
Sbanotto, A ;
Mariani, L ;
Nolè, F ;
Leida, E ;
Rocca, A ;
De Pas, T ;
Goldhirsch, A .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 92 (03) :265-272
[5]   Evaluation of the relative importance of chemotherapeutic and antiemetic efficacy in various oncologic settings [J].
Ettinger, David S. ;
Grunberg, Steven M. ;
Hauber, A. Brett ;
Mohamed, Ateesha F. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2009, 17 (04) :405-411
[6]   EXPLORING THE SOCIAL VALUE OF HEALTH-CARE INTERVENTIONS: A STATED PREFERENCE DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT [J].
Green, Colin ;
Gerard, Karen .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2009, 18 (08) :951-976
[7]   Do drug costs affect physicians' prescription decisions? [J].
Hart, J ;
Salman, H ;
Bergman, M ;
Neuman, V ;
Rudniki, C ;
Gilenberg, D ;
Matalon, A ;
Djaldetti, M .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 241 (05) :415-420
[8]   Does reimbursement influence chemotherapy treatment for cancer patients? [J].
Jacobson, M ;
O'Malley, AJ ;
Earle, CC ;
Pakes, J ;
Gaccione, P ;
Newhouse, JP .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (02) :437-443
[9]   Changes in reimbursement rates and rules associated with the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act - Introduction [J].
Johnson, Philip E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2006, 63 :S2-S6
[10]   Physicians' preferences towards coagulation factor concentrates in the treatment of haemophilia with inhibitors: a discrete choice experiment [J].
Lee, W. C. ;
Joshi, A. V. ;
Woolford, S. ;
Sumner, M. ;
Brown, M. ;
Hadker, N. ;
Pashos, C. L. .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2008, 14 (03) :454-465