Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good

被引:52
作者
Bondi, Elizabeth [1 ]
Xu, Lily [1 ]
Acosta-Navas, Diana [2 ]
Killian, Jackson A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, John A Paulson Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Philosophy, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
AIES '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY | 2021年
关键词
artificial intelligence for social good; capabilities approach; participatory design; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1145/3461702.3462612
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Research in artificial intelligence (AI) for social good presupposes some definition of social good, but potential definitions have been seldom suggested and never agreed upon. The normative question of what AI for social good research should be "for" is not thoughtfully elaborated, or is frequently addressed with a utilitarian outlook that prioritizes the needs of the majority over those who have been historically marginalized, brushing aside realities of injustice and inequity. We argue that AI for social good ought to be assessed by the communities that the AI system will impact, using as a guide the capabilities approach, a framework to measure the ability of different policies to improve human welfare equity. Furthermore, we lay out how AI research has the potential to catalyze social progress by expanding and equalizing capabilities. We show how the capabilities approach aligns with a participatory approach for the design and implementation of AI for social good research in a framework we introduce called PACT, in which community members affected should be brought in as partners and their input prioritized throughout the project. We conclude by providing an incomplete set of guiding questions for carrying out such participatory AI research in a way that elicits and respects a community's own definition of social good.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 436
页数:12
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Abebe Rediet, 2018, AI Matters, V4, P27, DOI 10.1145/3284751.3284761
[2]   Roles for Computing in Social Change [J].
Abebe, Rediet ;
Barocas, Solon ;
Kleinberg, Jon ;
Levy, Karen ;
Raghavan, Manish ;
Robinson, David G. .
FAT* '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, 2020, :252-260
[3]   The Development of Capability Indicators [J].
Anand, Paul ;
Hunter, Graham ;
Carter, Ian ;
Dowding, Keith ;
Guala, Francesco ;
Van Hees, Martin .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND CAPABILITIES, 2009, 10 (01) :125-152
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Technology and Human Development
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, BERKELEY ISCHOOL NEW
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Women and Human Development
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Development of Freedom
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ROUTLEDGE INT HDB PA
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2003, FEM ECON, DOI DOI 10.1080/1354570022000077962
[10]   A DIFFICULTY IN THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL WELFARE [J].
Arrow, Kenneth J. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1950, 58 (04) :328-346