Two-step models to predict binding affinity of chemicals to the human estrogen receptor α by three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships (3D-QSARs) using receptor-ligand docking simulation

被引:18
作者
Akahori, Y
Nakai, M
Yakabe, Y
Takatsuki, A
Mizutani, M
Matsuo, M
Shimohigashi, Y
机构
[1] Chem Evaluat & Res Inst CERI, Chem Assessment Ctr, Kitakatsushika, Saitama 3450043, Japan
[2] Inst Mol Med Design Inc, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[3] Setsunan Univ, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Hirakata, Osaka 5730101, Japan
[4] Kyushu Univ, Fac & Grad Sch Sci, Dept Chem, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128581, Japan
关键词
two-step model; estrogen receptor; 3D-QSAR; docking simulation; discriminant analysis; multiple linear regression analysis;
D O I
10.1080/10659360500204442
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Binding of chemicals to the estrogen receptor (ER) is known to be a key mode of action of endocrine disruption effects. In this study, combined quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models from discriminant and multilinear regression (MLR) analyses, termed a two-step model, were developed. These were used to predict the binding potency to human ER alpha of four chemical groups, namely alkylphenols, phthalates, diphenylethanes and benzophenones. These groups are considered to be important chemical classes of ER-binders. The descriptors investigated were calculated following the simulation of docking between the receptor and ligand. Discriminant analysis in the first step of a two-step model was applied to distinguish binders from non-binders. It had a concordance, following leave-one-out (LOO), of greater than 87% for all chemical classes. Binders were defined as chemicals whose IC50 was reliably measured in a competitive binding assay. The MLR analysis in the second step was performed for the quantitative prediction of the binding affinity of chemicals that were previously discriminated as binders. The q(2) values for alkylphenols and diphenylethanes were 0.75 and 0.74, respectively. However good MLR relationships were not obtained for phthalates and benzophenones as the observed binding affinities of chemicals in these categories were weak and in a too narrow range.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 337
页数:15
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] The estradiol pharmacophore: Ligand structure-estrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site
    Anstead, GM
    Carlson, KE
    Katzenellenbogen, JA
    [J]. STEROIDS, 1997, 62 (03) : 268 - 303
  • [2] A computationally based identification algorithm for estrogen receptor ligands:: Part 1.: Predicting hERα binding affinity
    Bradbury, S
    Kamenska, V
    Schmieder, P
    Ankley, G
    Mekenyan, O
    [J]. TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 58 (02) : 253 - 269
  • [3] Colborn T, 1996, OUR STOLEN FUTURE, P306
  • [4] A 2ND GENERATION FORCE-FIELD FOR THE SIMULATION OF PROTEINS, NUCLEIC-ACIDS, AND ORGANIC-MOLECULES
    CORNELL, WD
    CIEPLAK, P
    BAYLY, CI
    GOULD, IR
    MERZ, KM
    FERGUSON, DM
    SPELLMEYER, DC
    FOX, T
    CALDWELL, JW
    KOLLMAN, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1995, 117 (19) : 5179 - 5197
  • [5] Development and validation of an average mammalian estrogen receptor-based QSAR model
    Mekenyan, O
    Kamenska, V
    Serafimova, R
    Poellinger, L
    Brouwer, A
    Walker, J
    [J]. SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (06) : 579 - 595
  • [6] RATIONAL AUTOMATIC SEARCH METHOD FOR STABLE DOCKING MODELS OF PROTEIN AND LIGAND
    MIZUTANI, MY
    TOMIOKA, N
    ITAI, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1994, 243 (02) : 310 - 326
  • [7] Binding characteristics of dialkyl phthalates for the estrogen receptor
    Nakai, M
    Tabira, Y
    Asai, D
    Yakabe, Y
    Shimyozu, T
    Noguchi, M
    Takatsuki, M
    Shimohigashi, Y
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 254 (02) : 311 - 314
  • [8] NAKAMURA K, 2000, JCPE J, V12, P177
  • [9] An integrated "4-phase" approach for setting endocrine disruption screening priorities - Phase I and II predictions of estrogen receptor binding affinity
    Shi, L
    Tong, W
    Fang, H
    Xie, Q
    Hong, H
    Perkins, R
    Wu, J
    Tu, M
    Blair, RM
    Branham, WS
    Waller, C
    Walker, J
    Sheehan, DM
    [J]. SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (01) : 69 - 88
  • [10] The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator recognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen
    Shiau, AK
    Barstad, D
    Loria, PM
    Cheng, L
    Kushner, PJ
    Agard, DA
    Greene, GL
    [J]. CELL, 1998, 95 (07) : 927 - 937