Comparison of CT and MRI in imaging diagnosis of aortic dissection

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Jianing [1 ]
Xie, Junmin [2 ]
Meng, Xiaomin [2 ]
Gong, Xuepeng [3 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ, Affiliated Hosp, CT MRI Room, Baoding, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Baoding, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] PLA Air Force 986 Hosp, Imaging Dept, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2022年 / 42卷
关键词
aortic dissection; CT; MRI; diagnosis value; imaging; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1590/fst.23621
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Aortic dissection(AD) is a life-threatening disease due to a tear in the intimal layer of the aorta within the aortic wall. To compare diagnostic value and imaging of AD between computed tomography(CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 120 AD patients diagnosed were examined with 64-slice CT and 1.5 MRI, the imaging data of true and false lumen, intimal flap, intimal tear, mural thrombus and aortic calcification were compared. The intimal flap rate of CT and MRI was 81.7% and 100%, respectively; The intimal tear rate of CT and MRI was 68.3% and 83.3%, respectively; The rate of mural thrombus in CT and MRI was 26.7% and 54.2%, respectively; The rate of aortic calcification in CT and MRI was 62.5% and 18.3%, respectively; The number of patients with intimal tear lower than 1mm in CT and MRI was 5 and 0, respectively. Both CT and MRI can show the true and false lumen well, but the detection rate of intimal flap, intimal tear and mural thrombosis in MRI is significantly higher than that in CT, and the detection rate of aortic calcification and intimal tear<1mm in CT is higher than that in MRI.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Acute aortic dissection with intimal intussusception: MRI appearances
    Fan, ZM
    Zhang, ZC
    Ma, XH
    Guo, X
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (03) : 841 - 843
  • [42] The diagnosis of aortic dissection by emergency medicine ultrasound
    Fojtik, John P.
    Costantino, Thomas G.
    Dean, Anthony J.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 32 (02) : 191 - 196
  • [43] CT and MRI in the diagnosis of tuberculosis
    Buxi T.B.S.
    Sud S.
    Vohra R.
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2002, 69 (11) : 965 - 972
  • [44] Direct comparison of choline PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer
    Huang, Shi-ming
    Yin, Liang
    Yue, Jian-lan
    Li, Yan-feng
    Yang, Yang
    Lin, Zhi-chun
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (50)
  • [45] Imaging of ependymomas: MRI and CT
    E. L. Yuh
    A. J. Barkovich
    N. Gupta
    Child's Nervous System, 2009, 25
  • [46] Acute Aortic Dissection: Diagnosis and Initial Management
    Pablo Umana, Juan
    Camacho, Jaime
    REVISTA MEDICA CLINICA LAS CONDES, 2022, 33 (03): : 218 - 226
  • [47] Comparison of CT and MRI for Diagnosis of Suspected Scaphoid Fractures
    Mallee, Wouter
    Doornberg, Job N.
    Ring, David
    van Dijk, C. Niek
    Maas, Mario
    Goslings, J. Carel
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (01) : 20 - 28
  • [48] Imaging features of renal malperfusion in aortic dissection
    van Bakel, Pieter A. J.
    Henry, Matthew
    Kim, Karen M.
    Yang, Bo
    van Herwaarden, Joost A.
    Figueroa, C. Alberto
    Patel, Himanshu J.
    Williams, David M.
    Burris, Nicholas S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 61 (04) : 805 - 813
  • [49] Usefulness of ultrasound in the management of aortic dissection
    Liu, Fengju
    Huang, Lianjun
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (03) : 103 - 109
  • [50] The Role of Imaging in Aortic Dissection and Related Syndromes
    Baliga, Ragavendra. R.
    Nienaber, Christoph A.
    Bossone, Eduardo
    Oh, Jae K.
    Isselbacher, Eric M.
    Sechtem, Udo
    Fattori, Rossella
    Raman, Subha V.
    Eagle, Kim A.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2014, 7 (04) : 406 - 424