What drives employees to share their tacit knowledge in practice?

被引:34
作者
Hau, Yong Sauk [1 ]
Kim, Byoungsoo [2 ]
Lee, Heeseok [3 ]
机构
[1] Yeungnam Univ, Sch Business, Gyongsan, South Korea
[2] Seoul Womens Univ, Dept Business Adm, Coll Social Sci, 621 Hwarangro, Seoul 139774, South Korea
[3] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
tacit knowledge sharing; social capital; individual motivations; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; INTENTION; BEHAVIOR; CREATION; MODEL; TRUST; FIRM;
D O I
10.1057/kmrp.2014.32
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Tacit knowledge is internal to an individual in the form of know-how, experience or expertise. To create and maintain a sustainable competitive advantage, many companies have made substantial efforts to promote employees' sharing of their tacit knowledge. In practice, however, tacit knowledge sharing (TKS) between employees is rare. This study empirically analyses the impacts of individual motivations and social capital on employees' TKS in order to deepen and widen the understanding about the antecedents to employees' TKS. Data collected from 713 employees in multiple industries were empirically tested by using structural equation modelling analysis through partial least squares. The analysis results show that anticipated intrinsic rewards and social capital positively influence employees' TKS whereas anticipated extrinsic rewards have a negative effect on it. Furthermore, they show that employees' attitudes, intentions and subjective norms of TKS play significant roles in linking the effects of individual motivations and social capital to employees' TKS through a combination of expectancy theory and social capital theory based on the theory of planned behaviour. Theoretical and practical implications are presented on the basis of the major findings from this study.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 308
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
[31]   Why would online garners share their innovation-conducive knowledge in the online game user community? Integrating individual motivations and social capital perspectives [J].
Hau, Yong Sauk ;
Kim, Young-Gul .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (02) :956-970
[32]   Social relationship and its role in knowledge management systems usage [J].
He, Wei ;
Qiao, Qian ;
Wei, Kwok-Kee .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2009, 46 (03) :175-180
[33]   Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use [J].
Holste, J. Scott ;
Fields, Dail .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 14 (01) :128-140
[34]   Understanding the effect of knowledge management strategies on knowledge management performance: A contingency perspective [J].
Kim, Tae Hun ;
Lee, Jae-Nam ;
Chun, Jae Uk ;
Benbasat, Izak .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 51 (04) :398-416
[35]   The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation [J].
Leonard, D ;
Sensiper, S .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 40 (03) :112-+
[36]  
Liang HG, 2007, MIS QUART, V31, P59
[37]   To share or not to share: Modeling tacit knowledge sharing, its mediators and antecedents [J].
Lin, Chieh-Peng .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 70 (04) :411-428
[38]   Mining group-based knowledge flows for sharing task knowledge [J].
Liu, Duen-Ren ;
Lai, Chin-Hui .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2011, 50 (02) :370-386
[39]   Tacit knowledge and knowledge management: The keys to sustainable competitive advantage [J].
Lubit, R .
ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 2001, 29 (03) :164-178
[40]   A theory of human motivation [J].
Maslow, AH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1943, 50 :370-396