A model to predict outcomes for endovascular aneurysm repair using preoperative variables

被引:105
作者
Barnes, M. [3 ]
Boult, M. [2 ]
Maddern, G. [1 ,2 ]
Fitridge, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Surg, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
[2] Royal Australasian Coll Surg, Stepney, SA 5069, Australia
[3] CSIRO Math & Informat Sci, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
关键词
aortic aneurysm; abdominal; EVAR; AAA; models; statistical; registries; data collection;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.12.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose. Models have been developed to predict the likely outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)for patients, based on a longitudinal Australian audit. Methodology. Mid-term progress of 961 Australian patients who underwent EVAR has been collected and used to develop predictive models for 17 outcomes. Stepwise forward logistic regressions determined the significant preoperative patient variables to be included in each outcome model. An interactive program was subsequently developed to allow surgeons to review the predicted success rates for patients about to undergo the procedure. Each model was assessed using a global goodness of fit test and was internally validated using bootstrapping. Results. Eight pre-operative variables were included in the interactive model for 17 outcomes. The eight variables used were aneurysm size, age, ASA, gender, creatinine, aortic neck angle, infrarenal neck diameter and infrarenal neck length. The outcomes predicted included perioperative mortality, perioperative morbidity, mid-term survival and reintervention rates. All outcome models achieved reasonable goodness of fit, with the exception of the model for conversion to open repair (p = 0.04). With respect to validation, survival, aneurysm related deaths, migrations, ruptures and conversions to open repair performed best in terms of predictive discrimination. Models for survival, migrations and conversions to open repairs performed best in terms of bias corrected R-squared index. The models with the smallest calibration error were 3 and 5 year survival, early deaths and mid-term type I endoleaks. Conclusions. An interactive model is available, which can assist vascular surgeons to evaluate the expected outcomes for a particular patient undergoing EVAR. The validated model is useful for counselling and pre-operative decision making. (C) 2008 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 579
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] BARNES M, 2006, 06162 CMIS CSIRO
  • [2] Factors affecting survival after endovascular aneurysm repair: Results from a population based audit
    Boult, M.
    Maddern, G.
    Barnes, M.
    Fitridge, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 34 (02) : 156 - 162
  • [3] Predictors of success following endovascular aneurysm repair: Mid-term results
    Boult, M
    Babidge, W
    Maddern, G
    Barnes, M
    Fitridge, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 31 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [4] Endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm - Contemporary Australian experience
    Boult, M
    Babidge, W
    Maddern, G
    Fitridge, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 28 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [5] Patient fitness and survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients from the UK EVAR trials
    Brown, L. C.
    Greenhalgh, R. M.
    Howell, S.
    Powell, J. T.
    Thompson, S. G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (06) : 709 - 716
  • [6] Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Chaikof, EL
    Fillinger, MF
    Matsumura, JS
    Rutherford, RB
    White, GH
    Blankensteijn, JD
    Bernhard, VM
    Harris, PL
    Kent, KC
    May, J
    Veith, FJ
    Zarins, CK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) : 1061 - 1066
  • [7] Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial
    Greenhalgh, RM
    Brown, LC
    Kwong, GPS
    Powell, JT
    Thompson, SG
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 364 (9437) : 843 - 848
  • [8] Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial
    Greenhalgh, RM
    Brown, LC
    Epstein, D
    Kwong, GPS
    Powell, JT
    Sculpher, MJ
    Thompson, SG
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 365 (9478) : 2187 - 2192
  • [9] Comparison of mortality prediction models after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Hadjianastassiou, V. G.
    Tekkis, P. P.
    Athanasiou, T.
    Muktadir, A.
    Young, J. D.
    Hands, L. J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 33 (05) : 536 - 543
  • [10] Harrell FE., 2001, REGRESSION MODELING, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7