Blunt splenic injuries: Have we watched long enough?

被引:75
作者
Smith, Jason [2 ]
Armen, Scott [2 ]
Cook, Charles H. [2 ]
Martin, Larry C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Surg, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE | 2008年 / 64卷 / 03期
关键词
splenic trauma; blunt splenic injuries; time to operation;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0b013e3181650fb4
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injuries (BSIs) has been used with increasing frequency in adult patients. There are currently no definitive guidelines established for how long BSI patients should be-monitored for failure of NOM after injury. Methods: This study was performed to ascertain the length of inpatient observation needed to capture most failures, and to identify factors associated with failure of NOM. We utilized the National Trauma Data Bank to determine time to failure after BSI. Results: During the 5-year study period, 23,532 patients were identified with BSI, of which 2,366 (10% overall) were taken directly to surgery (within 2 hours of arrival). Of 21,166 patients initially managed nonoperatively, 18,506 were successful (79% of all-comers). Patients with isolated BSI are currently monitored similar to 5 days as inpatients. Of patients failing NOM, 95% failed during the first 72 hours, and monitoring 2 additional days saw only 1.5% more failures. Factors influencing success of NOM included computed tomographic injury grade, severity of patient injury, and American College of Surgeons designation of trauma center. Importantly, patients who failed NOM did not seem to have detrimental outcomes when compared with patients with successful NOM. No statistically significant predictive variables could be identified that would help predict patients who would go on to fail NOM. Conclusions. we conclude that at least 80% of BSI can be managed successfully with NOM, and that patients should be monitored as inpatients for failure after BSI for 3 to 5 days.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 663
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
*AM COLL SURG COMM, 2002, NAT TRAUM DAT BANK A
[2]   Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: Results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [J].
Best, WR ;
Khuri, SF ;
Phelan, M ;
Hur, K ;
Henderson, WG ;
Demakis, JG ;
Daley, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2002, 194 (03) :257-266
[3]   PREDICTABILITY OF SPLENIC SALVAGE BY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
BUNTAIN, WL ;
GOULD, HR ;
MAULL, KI .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1988, 28 (01) :24-34
[4]  
Cathey KL, 1998, AM SURGEON, V64, P450
[5]  
COBURN MC, 1995, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V130, P332
[6]   NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT SPLENIC TRAUMA - A MULTICENTER EXPERIENCE [J].
COGBILL, TH ;
MOORE, EE ;
JURKOVICH, GJ ;
MORRIS, JA ;
MUCHA, P ;
SHACKFORD, SR ;
STOLEE, RT ;
MOORE, FA ;
PILCHER, S ;
LOCICERO, R ;
FARNELL, MB ;
MOLIN, M .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1989, 29 (10) :1312-1317
[7]   SEVERE LATE POSTSPLENECTOMY INFECTION [J].
CULLINGFORD, GL ;
WATKINS, DN ;
WATTS, ADJ ;
MALLON, DF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (06) :716-721
[8]   SPLENIC TRAUMA AND OVERWHELMING POSTSPLENECTOMY INFECTION [J].
DICATALDO, A ;
PULEO, S ;
LI DESTRI, G ;
RACALBUTO, A ;
TROMBATORE, G ;
LATTERI, F ;
RODOLICO, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 74 (05) :343-345
[9]   A 4-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH SPLENECTOMY VERSUS SPLENORRHAPHY [J].
FELICIANO, DV ;
BITONDO, CG ;
MATTOX, KL ;
RUMISEK, JD ;
BURCH, JM ;
JORDAN, GL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1985, 201 (05) :568-575
[10]  
HAGIWARA A, 1996, AM J ROENTGENOL, V167, P151