Transurethral resection of the prostate is an independent risk factor for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Jin, Kun [1 ]
Qiu, Shi [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Xin-Yang [1 ]
Zheng, Xiao-Nan [1 ]
Tu, Xiang [1 ]
Tang, Lian-Sha [1 ]
Yang, Lu [1 ]
Wei, Qiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Inst Urol, Dept Urol, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Ctr Biomed Big Data, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
biochemical recurrence; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; transurethral resection; MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; PROPENSITY SCORE; LOCAL TREATMENT; OUTCOMES; PREVALENCE; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; HISTORY;
D O I
10.4103/aja.aja_54_19
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) is important for measuring the oncological outcomes of patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP). Whether transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has negative postoperative effects on oncological outcomes remains controversial. The primary aim of our retrospective study was to determine whether a history of TURP could affect the postoperative BCR rate. We retrospectively reviewed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who had undergone RP between January 2009 and October 2017. Clinical data on age, prostate volume, serum prostate-specific antigen levels (PSA), biopsy Gleason score (GS), metastasis stage (TNM), D'Amico classification, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification were collected. Statistical analyses including Cox proportional hazard models and sensitivity analyses which included propensity score matching, were performed, and the inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted estimator and standardized mortality ratio-weighted estimator were determined. We included 1083 patients, of which 118 had a history of TURP. Before matching, the non-TURP group differed from the TURP group with respect to GS (P= 0.047), prostate volume (mean: 45.19 vs 36.00 ml, P < 0.001), and PSA level (mean: 29.41 vs 15.11 ng ml-1, P= 0.001). After adjusting for age, PSA level, T stage, N stage, M stage, and GS, the TURP group showed higher risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-3.94, P= 0.004). After matching (ratio 1:4), patients who underwent TURP were still more likely to develop BCR according to the adjusted propensity score (HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.05-3.79, P= 0.034). Among patients with PCa, those with a history of TURP were more likely to develop BCR after RP.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 221
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Freedland, SJ
    Humphreys, EB
    Mangold, LA
    Eisenberger, M
    Dorey, FJ
    Walsh, PC
    Partin, AW
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (04): : 433 - 439
  • [22] Management of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer A case report
    Shen, Jiayan
    Zang, Shoumei
    Yu, Xiaokai
    Zhao, Feng
    Jiang, Peng
    Zhong, Baishu
    Zhou, Hua
    Yan, Senxiang
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (27)
  • [23] Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy
    Castillejos-Molina, Ricardo
    Rodriguez-Covarrubias, Francisco
    Sotomayor, Mariano
    Olivia Gomez-Alvarado, M.
    Villalobos-Gollas, Miguel
    Gabilondo, Fernando
    Feria-Bernal, Guillermo
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2011, 87 (03) : 270 - 275
  • [24] Natural history of treated biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Porter, Christopher R.
    Walz, Jochen
    Gallina, Andrea
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Kodama, Koichi
    Gibbons, Robert P.
    Correa, Roy, Jr.
    Perrotte, Paul
    Benard, Francois
    Saad, Fred
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 77 - 78
  • [26] Retrospective Study of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Compared with Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy at the Same Institution
    Suzuki, Yasutomo
    Matsuzawa, Ichiro
    Hamasaki, Tsutomu
    Kimura, Go
    Kondo, Yukihiro
    JOURNAL OF NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2012, 79 (06) : 416 - 421
  • [27] Expression of Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Prostate Cancer May Indicate a Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
    Nishida, Sachiyo
    Hirohashi, Yoshihiko
    Torigoe, Toshihiko
    Nojima, Masanori
    Inoue, Ryuta
    Kitamura, Hiroshi
    Tanaka, Toshiaki
    Asanuma, Hiroko
    Sato, Noriyuki
    Masumori, Naoya
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (01) : 413 - 418
  • [28] High-grade inflammation in prostate cancer as a prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Irani, J
    Goujon, JM
    Ragni, E
    Peyrat, L
    Hubert, J
    Saint, F
    Mottet, N
    UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (03) : 467 - 472
  • [29] A qualitative transcriptional signature for predicting the biochemical recurrence risk of prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
    Li, Xiang
    Huang, Haiyan
    Zhang, Jiahui
    Jiang, Fengle
    Guo, Yating
    Shi, Yidan
    Guo, Zheng
    Ao, Lu
    PROSTATE, 2020, 80 (05): : 376 - 387
  • [30] Risk-Adjusted Hazard Rates of Biochemical Recurrence for Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy
    Walz, Jochen
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Reuther, Alwyn
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (02) : 412 - 421