Adjunctive treatment with psychostimulants and stimulant-like drugs for resistant bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
作者
Tsapakis, Evangelia Maria [1 ,2 ]
Preti, Antonio [3 ,4 ]
Mintzas, Michael D. [1 ]
Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N. [5 ]
机构
[1] Agios Charalambos Mental Hlth Clin, Iraklion, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Psychiat 1, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Genneruxi Med Ctr, Cagliari, Italy
[4] Univ Hosp Cagliari, Ctr Consultat Liaison Psychiat & Psychosomat, Cagliari, Italy
[5] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat 3, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
Meta-analysis; treatment-resistant bipolar depression; lisdexamphetamine; armodafinil; modafinil; DOUBLE-BLIND; I DISORDER; MODAFINIL; ARMODAFINIL; DOPAMINE; EFFICACY; EPISODES; LISDEXAMFETAMINE; HETEROGENEITY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1017/S109285292000156X
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Depression is considered to be the most difficult to treat phase of bipolar disorder as patients experience residual symptoms causing long-term disability. This work aims to explore the role of add-on stimulant and stimulant-like medication in resistant bipolar depression patients. Methods Systematic review of add-on stimulants and stimulant-like drugs in resistant bipolar depression by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Analysis was performed using the random-effects models. Heterogeneity was evaluated with Cochran's Q and I-2 statistics. Results Six randomized controlled trials of add-on modafinil, armodafinil, and lisdexamphetamine (LDX) (n = 813) vs placebo (n = 815) in the treatment of resistant bipolar depression were included. These drugs were more likely to induce remission from an episode of resistant bipolar depression (relative risk [RR] = 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.77; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome = 16). Moreover, they did not induce more dropouts than placebo (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.91-1.18), nor did they increase the risk of adverse effects (53/772 vs 41/771) at the end of treatment (RR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.81-2.10; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome = 62). Suicidality and manic switch were not affected by active treatment. Heterogeneity was low (Cochran's Q: P > .05), but sometimes with a large CI. Conclusions LDX, modafinil, and armodafinil seem to offer a reasonably well-tolerated and safe treatment in resistant bipolar depression. Treatment guidelines should, therefore, be revised to include these medications earlier in the therapeutic algorithm for resistant acute bipolar depression. Further research is, however, necessary for the elucidation of the clinical usefulness of these and other similar compounds.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 636
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of Adjunctive Pharmacotherapies for Acute Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Bahji, Anees
    Ermacora, Dylan
    Stephenson, Callum
    Hawken, Emily R.
    Vazquez, Gustavo
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2021, 66 (03): : 274 - 288
  • [12] Cariprazine in the treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pinto, Jairo Vinicius
    Saraf, Gayatri
    Vigo, Daniel
    Keramatian, Kamyar
    Chakrabarty, Trisha
    Yatham, Lakshmi N.
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2020, 22 (04) : 360 - 371
  • [13] N-acetylcysteine as an adjunctive treatment for bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Nery, Fabiano G.
    Li, Wenbin
    DelBello, Melissa P.
    Welge, Jeffrey A.
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2021, 23 (07) : 707 - 714
  • [14] Mitochondrial modulators in the treatment of bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Liang
    Chen, Junyu
    Xiao, Ling
    Wang, Qing
    Wang, Gaohua
    TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [15] Lithium in the treatment of acute bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rakofsky, Jeffrey J.
    Lucido, Michael J.
    Dunlop, Boadie W.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2022, 308 : 268 - 280
  • [16] Adjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hirakawa, Hirofumi
    Terao, Takeshi
    Muronaga, Masaaki
    Ishii, Nobuyoshi
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [17] The Efficacy of Psychostimulants in Major Depressive Episodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    McIntyre, Roger S.
    Lee, Yena
    Zhou, Aileen J.
    Rosenblat, Joshua D.
    Peters, Evyn M.
    Lam, Raymond W.
    Kennedy, Sidney H.
    Rong, Carola
    Jerrell, Jeanette M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 37 (04) : 412 - 418
  • [18] Quetiapine for bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chiesa, Alberto
    Chierzi, Federico
    De Ronchi, Diana
    Serretti, Alessandro
    INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 27 (02) : 76 - 90
  • [19] Pramipexole in the treatment of unipolar and bipolar depression. A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tundo, A.
    de Filippis, R.
    De Crescenzo, F.
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 140 (02) : 116 - 125
  • [20] Cariprazine in the acute treatment of unipolar and bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martins-Correia, Joao
    Fernandes, Luis Afonso
    Kenny, Ryan
    Salas, Barbara
    Karmani, Sneha
    Inskip, Alex
    Pearson, Fiona
    Watson, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2024, 362 : 297 - 307