Adjunctive treatment with psychostimulants and stimulant-like drugs for resistant bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Tsapakis, Evangelia Maria [1 ,2 ]
Preti, Antonio [3 ,4 ]
Mintzas, Michael D. [1 ]
Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N. [5 ]
机构
[1] Agios Charalambos Mental Hlth Clin, Iraklion, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Psychiat 1, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Genneruxi Med Ctr, Cagliari, Italy
[4] Univ Hosp Cagliari, Ctr Consultat Liaison Psychiat & Psychosomat, Cagliari, Italy
[5] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat 3, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
Meta-analysis; treatment-resistant bipolar depression; lisdexamphetamine; armodafinil; modafinil; DOUBLE-BLIND; I DISORDER; MODAFINIL; ARMODAFINIL; DOPAMINE; EFFICACY; EPISODES; LISDEXAMFETAMINE; HETEROGENEITY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1017/S109285292000156X
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Depression is considered to be the most difficult to treat phase of bipolar disorder as patients experience residual symptoms causing long-term disability. This work aims to explore the role of add-on stimulant and stimulant-like medication in resistant bipolar depression patients. Methods Systematic review of add-on stimulants and stimulant-like drugs in resistant bipolar depression by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Analysis was performed using the random-effects models. Heterogeneity was evaluated with Cochran's Q and I-2 statistics. Results Six randomized controlled trials of add-on modafinil, armodafinil, and lisdexamphetamine (LDX) (n = 813) vs placebo (n = 815) in the treatment of resistant bipolar depression were included. These drugs were more likely to induce remission from an episode of resistant bipolar depression (relative risk [RR] = 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.77; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome = 16). Moreover, they did not induce more dropouts than placebo (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.91-1.18), nor did they increase the risk of adverse effects (53/772 vs 41/771) at the end of treatment (RR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.81-2.10; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome = 62). Suicidality and manic switch were not affected by active treatment. Heterogeneity was low (Cochran's Q: P > .05), but sometimes with a large CI. Conclusions LDX, modafinil, and armodafinil seem to offer a reasonably well-tolerated and safe treatment in resistant bipolar depression. Treatment guidelines should, therefore, be revised to include these medications earlier in the therapeutic algorithm for resistant acute bipolar depression. Further research is, however, necessary for the elucidation of the clinical usefulness of these and other similar compounds.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 636
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the Roles of Stimulants/Stimulant-like Drugs and Dopamine-agonists in the Treatment of Bipolar Depression
    Dell'Osso, Bernardo
    Ketter, Terence A.
    Cremaschi, Laura
    Spagnolin, Gregorio
    Altamura, A. Carlo
    CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS, 2013, 15 (08)
  • [2] Assessing the Roles of Stimulants/Stimulant-like Drugs and Dopamine-agonists in the Treatment of Bipolar Depression
    Bernardo Dell’Osso
    Terence A. Ketter
    Laura Cremaschi
    Gregorio Spagnolin
    A. Carlo Altamura
    Current Psychiatry Reports, 2013, 15
  • [3] Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive modafinil/armodafinil in bipolar depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Nunez, Nicolas A.
    Singh, Balwinder
    Romo-Nava, Francisco
    Joseph, Boney
    Veldic, Marin
    Cuellar-Barboza, Alfredo
    Cabello Arreola, Alejandra
    Vande Voort, Jennifer L.
    Croarkin, Paul
    Moore, Katherine M.
    Biernacka, Joanna
    McElroy, Susan L.
    Frye, Mark A.
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2020, 22 (02) : 109 - 120
  • [4] Prescription psychostimulants for the treatment of stimulant use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tardelli, Vitor S.
    Bisaga, Adam
    Arcadepani, Felipe B.
    Gerra, Gilberto
    Levin, Frances R.
    Fidalgo, Thiago M.
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 237 (08) : 2233 - 2255
  • [5] Prescription psychostimulants for the treatment of stimulant use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vitor S. Tardelli
    Adam Bisaga
    Felipe B. Arcadepani
    Gilberto Gerra
    Frances R. Levin
    Thiago M. Fidalgo
    Psychopharmacology, 2020, 237 : 2233 - 2255
  • [6] Dopaminergic agents in the treatment of bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Szmulewicz, A. G.
    Angriman, F.
    Samame, C.
    Ferraris, A.
    Vigo, D.
    Strejilevich, S. A.
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 135 (06) : 527 - 538
  • [7] Adjunctive antidepressants for the acute treatment of bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Yuliang
    Zhang, Huijuan
    Wang, Hongyan
    Wang, Chris
    Kung, Simon
    Li, Chunbo
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2022, 311
  • [8] Ketamine for Augmentation in Treatment Resistant Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Joseph, Boney
    Ahmed, Ahmed T.
    Parsaik, Ajay
    Erwin, Patricia
    Singh, Balwinder
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 85 (10) : S344 - S344
  • [9] Valproate for the treatment of acute bipolar depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Smith, L. A.
    Cornelius, V. R.
    Azorin, J. M.
    Perugi, G.
    Vieta, E.
    Young, A. H.
    Bowden, C. L.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2010, 122 (1-2) : 1 - 9
  • [10] Second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    De Fruyt, Juergen
    Deschepper, Ellen
    Audenaert, Kurt
    Constant, Eric
    Floris, Michel
    Pitchot, William
    Sienaert, Pascal
    Souery, Daniel
    Claes, Stephan
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 26 (05) : 603 - 617