Emergence of multiple groups of learners with different writing-development trajectories in classroom: Growth mixture modeling

被引:15
作者
Baba, Kyoko [1 ]
Nitta, Ryo [2 ]
机构
[1] Kinjo Gakuin Univ, Dept English, Moriyama Ku, 2-1723 Omori, Nagoya, Aichi 4638521, Japan
[2] Rikkyo Univ, Ctr Foreign Language Educ & Res, Toshima Ku, 3-34-1 Nishi Ikebukuro, Tokyo 1718501, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Multiple learner groups; Classroom; Writing development; Complex dynamic systems theory; Growth mixture model; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100856
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
To explore factors that may affect learners' longitudinal developmental trajectories, we investi-gated whether L2 learners show divergent trajectories of second-language writing development at a group level when they iterate a narrative writing task procedure in class from the perspective of complex dynamic systems theory. One-hundred five university students who were learning En-glish as a foreign language in Japan and spoke Japanese as a mother tongue performed a timed narrative-writing task procedure once a week over one academic year (30 times). A growth mixture model was used to identify three groups with different developmental patterns: stag -nating, steadily increasing, and markedly increasing. A general growth mixture model was used to indicate that the three groups had different achievements not only in writing performance but also in the course grade. It was also revealed that the grouping was influenced by the type of reflecting the students did after writing a composition. These findings suggest that individuals orient and act on a task differently, resulting in divergent developmental trajectories even at the group level. The results also indicate that detailed, rather than simple and superficial, reflection on one's writing may promote learning through task iteration.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Three-Step Approaches Using Mplus [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (03) :329-341
[2]   Phase Transitions in Development of Writing Fluency From a Complex Dynamic Systems Perspective [J].
Baba, Kyoko ;
Nitta, Ryo .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2014, 64 (01) :1-35
[3]  
Baba Kyoko., 2020, COMPLEX DYNAMIC SYST, P3, DOI DOI 10.1075/LLLT.54.01BAB
[4]  
Boud D., 2001, Promoting journal writing in adult education. New directions in adult and continuing education No. 90, P9, DOI [DOI 10.1002/ACE.16, 10.1002/ACE.16]
[5]   Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends [J].
Bulte, Bram ;
Housen, Alex .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2018, 28 (01) :147-164
[6]  
Bygate M., 2018, RECENT PERSPECTIVES, P143
[7]  
Byrne D., 2012, CLUSTER ANAL, V1, pxvii
[8]  
Byrne D., 2002, INTERPRETING QUANTIT
[9]  
Byrnes H., 2020, Complex dynamic systems theory and L2 writing development, P241, DOI 10.1075/lllt.54.10byr
[10]   Dynamic Development in Speaking Versus Writing in Identical Twins [J].
Chan, HuiPing ;
Verspoor, Marjolijn ;
Vahtrick, Louisa .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2015, 65 (02) :298-325