Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability

被引:65
|
作者
Tremblay, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Larochelle-Brunet, Felix [1 ]
Lafleur, Louis-Philippe [1 ]
El Mouderrib, Sofia [1 ]
Lepage, Jean-Francois [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Theoret, Hugo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] UCL, Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, 33 Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BG, England
[3] CHU Sherbrooke, Ctr Rech, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Pediat, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
inter-subject variability; motor evoked potential variability; primary motor cortex; transcranial direct current stimulation; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; VARIABILITY; PLASTICITY; HUMANS; MODEL; TDCS;
D O I
10.1111/ejn.13321
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Since the initial demonstration of linear effects of stimulation duration and intensity on the strength of after-effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), few studies have systematically assessed how varying these parameters modulates corticospinal excitability. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the effects of anodal tDCS on corticospinal excitability at two stimulation intensities (1mA, 2mA) and durations (10min, 20min), and determine the value of several variables in predicting response. Two groups of 20 individuals received, in two separate sessions, 1 and 2mA anodal tDCS (left primary motor cortex (M1)-right supra-orbital montage) for either 10- or 20-min. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered over left M1 and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of the contralateral hand were recorded prior to tDCS and every 5min for 20-min post-tDCS. The following predictive variables were evaluated: I-wave recruitment, stimulation intensity, baseline M1 excitability and inter-trial MEP variability. Results show that anodal tDCS failed to significantly modulate corticospinal excitability in all conditions. Furthermore, low response rates were identified across all parameter combinations. No baseline measure was significantly correlated with increases in MEP amplitude. However, a decrease in inter-trial MEP variability was linked to response to anodal tDCS. In conclusion, the present findings are consistent with recent reports showing high levels of inter-subject variability in the neurophysiological response to tDCS, which may partly explain inconsistent group results. Furthermore, the level of variability in the neurophysiological outcome measure, i.e. MEPs, appears to be related to response.
引用
收藏
页码:2184 / 2190
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Primary motor cortex activation by transcranial direct current stimulation in the human brain
    Kwon, Yong Hyun
    Ko, Myoung-Hwan
    Ahn, Sang Ho
    Kim, Yun-Hee
    Song, Jun Chan
    Lee, Chu-Hee
    Chang, Min Cheol
    Jang, Sung Ho
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2008, 435 (01) : 56 - 59
  • [42] Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI
    Antal, Andrea
    Polania, Rafael
    Schmidt-Samoa, Carsten
    Dechent, Peter
    Paulus, Walter
    NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 55 (02) : 590 - 596
  • [43] Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans
    Bashir, Shahid
    Ahmad, Shafiq
    Alatefi, Moath
    Hamza, Ali
    Sharaf, Mohamed
    Fecteau, Shirely
    Yoo, Woo Kyoung
    PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2019, 7 (13):
  • [44] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Intensity and Duration Effects on Tinnitus Suppression
    Shekhawat, Giriraj Singh
    Stinear, Cathy M.
    Searchfield, Grant D.
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2013, 27 (02) : 164 - 172
  • [45] Task-Specific Facilitation of Cognition by Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Prefrontal Cortex
    Pope, Paul A.
    Brenton, Jonathan W.
    Miall, R. Chris
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2015, 25 (11) : 4551 - 4558
  • [46] The effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor or somatosensory cortices on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields
    Sugawara, Kazuhiro
    Onishi, Hideaki
    Yamashiro, Koya
    Kojima, Sho
    Miyaguchi, Shota
    Kirimoto, Hikari
    Tsubaki, Atsuhiro
    Tamaki, Hiroyuki
    Shirozu, Hiroshi
    Kameyama, Shigeki
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 126 (01) : 60 - 67
  • [47] Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Ameliorates Chronic Pain and Reduces Short Intracortical Inhibition
    Antal, Andrea
    Terney, Daniella
    Kuehnl, Stefanie
    Paulus, Walter
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 39 (05) : 890 - 903
  • [48] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting the Entire Motor Network Does Not Increase Corticospinal Excitability
    van der Cruijsen, Joris
    Jonker, Zeb D.
    Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina
    Wijngaarden, Jessica E.
    Tangkau, Ditte A.
    Tulen, Joke H. M.
    Frens, Maarten A.
    Ribbers, Gerard M.
    Selles, Ruud W.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [49] Duration but not intensity influences transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) after-effects on cortical excitability
    Vignaud, Philippe
    Mondino, Marine
    Poulet, Emmanuel
    Palm, Ulrich
    Brunelin, Jerome
    NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 48 (02): : 89 - 92
  • [50] Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation
    Jamil, Asif
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    Kuo, Hsiao-I.
    Labruna, Ludovica
    Hasan, Alkomiet
    Paulus, Walter
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2017, 595 (04): : 1273 - 1288