Cortical evoked responses following esophageal balloon distension and electrical stimulation in healthy volunteers

被引:27
作者
Hollerbach, S
Hudoba, P
Fitzpatrick, D
Hunt, R
Upton, ARM
Tougas, G
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, GI Div, Med Ctr,Div Gastroenterol, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Dept Neurol, Med Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
evoked potentials; mechanical stimulation; electrical stimulation; vagal afferents; conduction velocity;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026667123187
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Recording of evoked potential responses represents an objective and quantifiable method to study visceral afferent sensory pathways in humans. We examined the evoked responses to mechanical distension (balloon) and electrical stimulation of the proximal and distal esophagus. A standard manometric catheter with a latex balloon and an additional electrode attached to its body was placed in the lower esophagus in 15 healthy young volunteers. Repeated nonpainful balloon distension stimuli above the individual sensation threshold (0.17 Hz, 12-20 mi) or short electrical impulses (0.2 Hz, 12-16 mA) were delivered in an alternate fashion at 23 and 33 cm from the nares. Evoked potential responses (EP) were recorded through 22 scalp surface electrodes using the standard 10/20 International EEG system of electrode placement. Balloon distension produced a reproducible triphasic response at both sites. Peak latencies of three negative EP peaks were 92 +/- 17, 229 +/- 40, and 339 +/- 36 msec with proximal stimulation versus 154 +/- 24, 275 +/- 24, and 384 +/- 30 msec obtained with distal stimulation (P < 0.001). Electrical stimulation produced a triphasic response with significantly shorter peak latencies at both sites when compared to mechanical stimulation (P < 0.001). Peak latencies were 74 +/- 12, 137 +/- 11, and 245 +/- 27 msec proximal versus 83 +/- 12, 148 +/- 32, and 247 +/- 51 msec with distal stimulation (P < 0.01). The calculated conduction velocities for both modes of stimulation (balloon: 1.73 +/- 0.9 m/sec vs electrical: 10.1 +/- 3.4 m/sec) are compatible with conduction through C fibers and A delta fibers, respectively. Both modes of stimulation produce characteristic brain responses that are conveyed through different types of afferent fibers. The respective contributions of both types of fibers to esophageal function and symptomatology can be specifically addressed using this approach in both normal and pathologic conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:2558 / 2566
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSES EVOKED BY ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF THE COCHLEAR NUCLEUS IN HUMAN-SUBJECTS [J].
WARING, MD .
EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 96 (04) :338-347
[42]   EFFECTS OF PROPOFOL, ETOMIDATE, MIDAZOLAM, AND FENTANYL ON MOTOR EVOKED-RESPONSES TO TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL OR MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN HUMANS [J].
KALKMAN, CJ ;
DRUMMOND, JC ;
RIBBERINK, AA ;
PATEL, PM ;
SANO, T ;
BICKFORD, RG .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (04) :502-509
[43]   Effects of distraction on pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and potentials following painful electrical stimulation [J].
Yamasaki, H ;
Kakigi, R ;
Watanabe, S ;
Hoshiyama, M .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (02) :165-175
[44]   Motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery: Responses of distal limb muscles to transcranial cortical stimulation with pulse trains [J].
Jones, SJ ;
Harrison, R ;
Koh, KF ;
Mendoza, N ;
Crockard, HA .
EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 100 (05) :375-383
[45]   Human entorhinal cortex electrical stimulation evoked short-latency potentials in the broad neocortical regions: Evidence from cortico-cortical evoked potential recordings [J].
Takeyama, Hirofumi ;
Matsumoto, Riki ;
Usami, Kiyohide ;
Nakae, Takuro ;
Kobayashi, Katsuya ;
Shimotake, Akihiro ;
Kikuchi, Takayuki ;
Yoshida, Kazumichi ;
Kunieda, Takeharu ;
Miyamoto, Susumu ;
Takahashi, Ryosuke ;
Ikeda, Akio .
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2019, 9 (09)
[46]   Changes in spinal but not cortical excitability following combined electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve and voluntary plantar-flexion [J].
Lagerquist, Olle ;
Mang, Cameron S. ;
Collins, David F. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2012, 222 (1-2) :41-53
[47]   Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation Intensity Dependently Facilitates Motor-Evoked Potentials Following Focal Electrical Stimulation of the Rat Motor Cortex [J].
Fujiki, Minoru ;
Kawasaki, Yukari ;
Fudaba, Hirotaka .
FRONTIERS IN NEURAL CIRCUITS, 2020, 14
[48]   The effect of task-irrelevant visual backgrounds on human transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked electroencephalography responses and cortical alpha activity [J].
Rutiku, Renate ;
Einberg, Anu ;
Imanaka, Kuniyasu ;
Bachmann, Talis .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 38 (12) :3768-3777
[49]   Changes in S100 Proteins Identified in Healthy Skin following Electrical Stimulation: Relevance for Wound Healing [J].
Lallyett, Chloe ;
Yeung, Ching-Yan Chloe ;
Nielson, Rie Harboe ;
Zeef, Leo A. H. ;
Chapman-Jones, David ;
Kjaer, Michael ;
Kadler, Karl E. .
ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2018, 31 (07) :322-327
[50]   Refractory properties of auditory brain-stem responses evoked by electrical stimulation of human cochlear nucleus: evidence of neural generators [J].
Waring, MD .
EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 108 (04) :331-344