Cortical evoked responses following esophageal balloon distension and electrical stimulation in healthy volunteers

被引:27
|
作者
Hollerbach, S
Hudoba, P
Fitzpatrick, D
Hunt, R
Upton, ARM
Tougas, G
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, GI Div, Med Ctr,Div Gastroenterol, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Dept Neurol, Med Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
evoked potentials; mechanical stimulation; electrical stimulation; vagal afferents; conduction velocity;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026667123187
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Recording of evoked potential responses represents an objective and quantifiable method to study visceral afferent sensory pathways in humans. We examined the evoked responses to mechanical distension (balloon) and electrical stimulation of the proximal and distal esophagus. A standard manometric catheter with a latex balloon and an additional electrode attached to its body was placed in the lower esophagus in 15 healthy young volunteers. Repeated nonpainful balloon distension stimuli above the individual sensation threshold (0.17 Hz, 12-20 mi) or short electrical impulses (0.2 Hz, 12-16 mA) were delivered in an alternate fashion at 23 and 33 cm from the nares. Evoked potential responses (EP) were recorded through 22 scalp surface electrodes using the standard 10/20 International EEG system of electrode placement. Balloon distension produced a reproducible triphasic response at both sites. Peak latencies of three negative EP peaks were 92 +/- 17, 229 +/- 40, and 339 +/- 36 msec with proximal stimulation versus 154 +/- 24, 275 +/- 24, and 384 +/- 30 msec obtained with distal stimulation (P < 0.001). Electrical stimulation produced a triphasic response with significantly shorter peak latencies at both sites when compared to mechanical stimulation (P < 0.001). Peak latencies were 74 +/- 12, 137 +/- 11, and 245 +/- 27 msec proximal versus 83 +/- 12, 148 +/- 32, and 247 +/- 51 msec with distal stimulation (P < 0.01). The calculated conduction velocities for both modes of stimulation (balloon: 1.73 +/- 0.9 m/sec vs electrical: 10.1 +/- 3.4 m/sec) are compatible with conduction through C fibers and A delta fibers, respectively. Both modes of stimulation produce characteristic brain responses that are conveyed through different types of afferent fibers. The respective contributions of both types of fibers to esophageal function and symptomatology can be specifically addressed using this approach in both normal and pathologic conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:2558 / 2566
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cortical Evoked Responses Following Esophageal Balloon Distension and Electrical Stimulation in Healthy Volunteers
    Stephan Hollerbach
    Peter Hudoba
    Debbie Fitzpatrick
    Richard Hunt
    Adrian R.M. Upton
    Gervais Tougas
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1998, 43 : 2558 - 2566
  • [2] CEREBRAL-EVOKED POTENTIAL RESPONSES FOLLOWING DIRECT VAGAL AND ESOPHAGEAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION IN HUMANS
    TOUGAS, G
    HUDOBA, P
    FITZPATRICK, D
    HUNT, RH
    UPTON, ARM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 264 (03): : G486 - G491
  • [3] MULTICHANNEL RECORDING OF CEREBRAL POTENTIALS-EVOKED BY ESOPHAGEAL BALLOON DISTENSION IN HUMANS
    WEUSTEN, BLAM
    FRANSSEN, H
    WIENEKE, GH
    SMOUT, AJPM
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1994, 39 (10) : 2074 - 2083
  • [4] Cortical evoked potentials in response to rapid balloon distension of the rectum and anal canal
    Haas, S.
    Brock, C.
    Krogh, K.
    Gram, M.
    Nissen, T. D.
    Lundby, L.
    Laurberg, S.
    Drewes, A. M.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2014, 26 (06) : 862 - 873
  • [5] A comparative study of cortical responses evoked by transcutaneous electrical vs CO2 laser stimulation
    de Tommaso, Marina
    Santostasi, Roberto
    Devitofrancesco, Vito
    Franco, Giovanni
    Vecchio, Eleonora
    Delussi, Marianna
    Livrea, Paolo
    Katzarava, Zaza
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 122 (12) : 2482 - 2487
  • [6] Psychogenic Pseudo-responses in an Electrical Cortical Stimulation
    Tamada, Tomoaki
    Enatsu, Rei
    Suzuki, Yuto
    Yokoyama, Rintaro
    Suzuki, Hime
    Ochi, Satoko
    Mikuni, Nobuhiro
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2019, 59 (07) : 287 - 290
  • [7] A quantitative method for evaluating cortical responses to electrical stimulation
    Crowther, Lawrence J.
    Brunner, Peter
    Kapeller, Christoph
    Guger, Christoph
    Kamada, Kyousuke
    Bunch, Marjorie E.
    Frawley, Bridget K.
    Lynch, Timothy M.
    Ritaccio, Anthony L.
    Schalk, Gerwin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2019, 311 : 67 - 75
  • [8] Photoacoustic microscopy of microvascular responses to cortical electrical stimulation
    Tsytsarev, Vassiliy
    Hu, Song
    Yao, Junjie
    Maslov, Konstantin
    Barbour, Dennis L.
    Wang, Lihong V.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2011, 16 (07)
  • [9] Cortical and spinal evoked potential response to electrical stimulation in human rectum
    Brian Garvin
    Lisa Lovely
    Alex Tsodikov
    Danielle Minecan
    Shaungson Hong
    John W Wiley
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010, 16 (43) : 5440 - 5446
  • [10] Cortical and spinal evoked potential response to electrical stimulation in human rectum
    Garvin, Brian
    Lovely, Lisa
    Tsodikov, Alex
    Minecan, Danielle
    Hong, Shaungson
    Wiley, John W.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (43) : 5440 - 5446