Co-Existence of ITS-G5 and C-V2X at an Urban Road Intersection

被引:0
作者
Jayaweera, Sandaruwan [1 ]
Manosha, Shashika [1 ]
Rajatheva, Nandana [1 ]
Latva-aho, Matti [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Ctr Wireless Commun, Oulu, Finland
来源
2021 JOINT EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON NETWORKS AND COMMUNICATIONS & 6G SUMMIT (EUCNC/6G SUMMIT) | 2021年
关键词
Intelligent transport systems; ITS-G5; IEEE; 802.11p; 3GPP; cellular vehicle-to-everything; physical layer; media access control layer; downlink; road-side unit; V2X COMMUNICATIONS; TECHNOLOGIES; DSRC;
D O I
10.1109/EUCNC/6GSUMMIT51104.2021.9482416
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
High mobility, low latency and high throughput requirements in intelligent transport systems (ITS) have paved the way for the development of new wireless communication technologies. Therefore, the 5.9 GHz band has been assigned to ITS applications under two main technologies. Europe's ITS-G5 is one such technology, which is based on IEEE 802.11p. The other alternative technology is 3GPP's cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X). Both of these technologies have their inherent advantages and disadvantages due to dissimilarities in their physical (PHY) and media access control (MAC) layer architectures. Therefore, the applicability of each technology will vary depending on the situation. While previous work has been mainly focused on the comparison of two technologies, in this paper, we investigate the benefit of the co-existence of both of these technologies for a V2I downlink scenario in a road-side unit (RSU) placed at the center of an urban road intersection. We propose an optimization scheme to achieve the best minimum signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) performance for the RSU while providing connectivity to the maximum possible number of vehicles. Our analysis shows that ITS-G5 should be given priority when communicating with larger number of vehicles while C-V2X should be given priority when less number of vehicles are requesting to connect with the RSU.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 258
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] 5GAA, 2017, COEX C V2X ITS G5 5
  • [2] Interworking of DSRC and Cellular Network Technologies for V2X Communications: A Survey
    Abboud, Khadige
    Omar, Hassan Aboubakr
    Zhuang, Weihua
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 65 (12) : 9457 - 9470
  • [3] Vehicular networking: Asurvey on spectrum access technologies and persisting challenges
    Atallah, Ribal F.
    Khabbaz, Maurice J.
    Assi, Chadi M.
    [J]. VEHICULAR COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 2 (03) : 125 - 149
  • [4] Survey and Perspectives of Vehicular Wi-Fi versus Sidelink Cellular-V2X in the 5G Era
    Bazzi, Alessandro
    Cecchini, Giammarco
    Menarini, Michele
    Masini, Barbara M.
    Zanella, Alberto
    [J]. FUTURE INTERNET, 2019, 11 (06)
  • [5] Cho YJ, 2018, IEEE GLOBE WORK
  • [6] New Automotive Electronics Technologies
    Fleming, Bill
    [J]. IEEE VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2012, 7 (04): : 4 - 12
  • [7] Enabling Efficient Coexistence of DSRC and C-V2X in Vehicular Networks
    Ghafoor, Kayhan Zrar
    Guizani, Mohsen
    Kong, Linghe
    Maghdid, Halgurd S.
    Jasim, Khalid Fadhil
    [J]. IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 27 (02) : 134 - 140
  • [8] Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS), 2017, 302571 ETSI
  • [9] A Comparison of the V2X Communication Systems: ITS-G5 and C-V2X
    Mannoni, Valerian
    Berg, Vincent
    Sesia, Stefania
    Perraud, Eric
    [J]. 2019 IEEE 89TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (VTC2019-SPRING), 2019,
  • [10] LTE-V for Sidelink 5G V2X Vehicular Communications A New 5G Technology for Short-Range Vehicle-to-Everything Communications
    Molina-Masegosa, Rafael
    Gozalvez, Javier
    [J]. IEEE VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2017, 12 (04): : 30 - 39