Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany

被引:94
作者
Drazkiewicz, Anna [1 ]
Challies, Edward [1 ]
Newig, Jens [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luneburg, Res Grp Governance Participat & Sustainabil, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Participation; Environmental governance; Conflict resolution; Water resources planning; Urban planning; Germany; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Public and stakeholder participation in environmental planning is often assumed to enhance effectiveness through improving the environmental quality of decisions and enhancing implementation. We draw on the literature on participatory environmental governance in order to derive key participation-related factors that are hypothesized to impact on decision quality and implementation. We then outline four cases of decision-making processes in local environmental planning in Germany, representing a variety of forms of public participation, and what we suggest can be seen as four different pathways to 'success' in participatory planning. The case studies, recounted on the basis of stakeholder interviews and secondary research, are subjected to a cross-case analysis in order to examine the influence of participation in each case. We consider how key participation-related factors played out across the cases, and assess both decision quality and implementation against counterfactual non-participatory, or less-participatory, scenarios. In moving beyond accounts of 'what happened', and considering how participation changed the order of things relative to 'what would have happened' under different scenarios, the research highlights how very different pathways may lead to 'success' in participatory environmental planning from the viewpoint of process organizers and planners sympathetic to environmental issues. We conclude that, given the significance of context and surprises, planners and process organizers must be open to different pathways to the successful conclusion of participatory planning processes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 222
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Ahn S., 2007, FREIRAUM MUNCHEN PER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, PARTICIPATORY GOVERN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Environ. Policy Gov, DOI [10.1002/eet.509, DOI 10.1002/EET.509]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, EU VERTR GEG DEUTSCH
[5]   Using risk communication to disclose the outcome of a participatory decision-making process: Effects on the perceived acceptability of risk-policy decision [J].
Arvai, JL .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2003, 23 (02) :281-289
[6]  
Arzet K., ISAR EXPERIENCE URBA
[7]  
Baranek E., 2004, VOLLER LEBEN UNESCO, P261
[8]  
Beierle T.C. Cayford., 2002, Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions
[9]  
Benz A, 2006, ROUTL ECPR STUD EUR, P1
[10]   Environmental organisations in new forms of political participation:: Ecological modernisation and the making of voluntary rules [J].
Boström, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2003, 12 (02) :175-193