Trends in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Exist Between Day of Surgical Scheduling and Day of Surgery

被引:4
|
作者
Cross, Austin G. [1 ]
Yedulla, Nikhil R. [1 ]
Ziedas, Alexander C. [1 ]
Elhage, Kareem G. [1 ]
Guo, Eric W. [1 ]
Hessburg, Luke T. [1 ]
Moutzouros, Vasilios [1 ]
Muh, Stephanie J. [1 ]
Makhni, Eric C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
computer adaptive testing; depression; pain interference; patient-reported outcomes; physical function; PROMIS; upper extremity;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.063
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To examine trends in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores among orthopedic sports medicine patients undergoing surgery who completed PROMIS forms both in the ambulatory (preoperative) setting at the time of surgical scheduling, as well as on the day of surgery (perioperative) prior to their procedure. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing various sports medicine-related surgeries were recruited. Patients were included if they were scheduled for surgery and completed preoperative PROMIS on the day of surgical scheduling and on the day of surgery. Patients were excluded if they refused the questionnaire or had been administered perioperative anesthesia, which would interfere with questionnaire completion. Paired samples t-tests were run between preoperative and perioperative PROMIS scores to determine statistical significance. Results: 153 patients were included with an average age of 46.5 years. The average (SD) time between completion of PROMIS questionnaires was 46.5 (44.4) days. The absolute value change in scores between preoperative and perioperative visits was 4.09 for PROMIS UE, 3.59 for PROMIS PF, 3.67 for PROMIS PI, and 4.13 for PROMIS D. The overall net change of scores between preoperative and perioperative visits were -.57 for PROMIS UE CAT, .16 points for PROMIS PF CAT, -.85 points for PROMIS PI CAT, and -2.14 points for PROMIS D CAT. Statistically significant differences in preoperative and perioperative PROMIS PI (P =.042) and PROMIS D (P =.004) scores were found. Conclusions: Health states-as measured by PROMIS CAT forms completed among patients undergoing orthopedic surgery-can either improve or worsen preoperatively between the time of administration in both the ambulatory and perioperative setting. Despite the existence of these preoperative trends, it is important to consider patient and surgery-specific causes, such as the anatomic region, type of surgical intervention, and timing of preoperative PROMIS administration. Level of Evidence: III, prognostic
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 144
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function and pain interference in spine surgery
    Khalifeh, Jawad M.
    Dibble, Christopher F.
    Hawesli, Ammar H.
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (02) : 165 - 174
  • [2] Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores with legacy patient-reported outcome scores in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair
    Patterson, Brendan M.
    Orvets, Nathan D.
    Aleem, Alexander W.
    Keener, Jay D.
    Calfee, Ryan P.
    Nixon, Devon C.
    Chamberlain, Aaron M.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (06) : S17 - S23
  • [3] Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Data Collection in a Private Orthopedic Surgery Practice
    Haskell, Andrew
    Kim, Todd
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 39 (05) : 517 - 521
  • [4] Relationship Between the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System and Traditional Patient-Reported Outcomes for Osteoarthritis
    Padilla, Jorge A.
    Rudy, Hayeem L.
    Gabor, Jonathan A.
    Friedlander, Scott
    Iorio, Richard
    Karia, Raj J.
    Slover, James D.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (02) : 265 - 272
  • [5] Establishing and comparing reference preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores in patients undergoing shoulder surgery
    Guo, Eric W.
    Elhage, Kareem
    Cross, Austin G.
    Hessburg, Luke
    Gulledge, Caleb M.
    Mehta, Nabil
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Makhni, Eric C.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (06) : 1223 - 1229
  • [6] Using percentiles in the interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores: Guidelines for autism
    Schuchard, Julia
    Kaplan-Kahn, Elizabeth A.
    Carle, Adam C.
    Holmes, Laura Graham
    Law, Kiely
    Miller, Judith S.
    Parish-Morris, Julia
    Forrest, Christopher B.
    AUTISM RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (12) : 2336 - 2345
  • [7] Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores predict postoperative outcome in total shoulder arthroplasty patients
    Chen, Raymond E.
    Papuga, M. Owen
    Nicandri, Gregg T.
    Miller, Richard J.
    Voloshin, Ilya
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (03) : 547 - 554
  • [8] Association between sleep dysfunction and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores in patients with rotator cuff tears
    Danilkowicz, Richard M.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Hinton, Zoe W.
    Meyer, Lucy E.
    Cheah, Jonathan W.
    Hutyra, Carolyn
    Poehlein, Emily
    Green, Cynthia L.
    Mather, Richard C.
    JOURNAL OF ISAKOS JOINT DISORDERS & ORTHOPAEDIC SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 9 (02) : 143 - 147
  • [9] Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in Orthopaedic Trauma Research
    Sperring, Colin P.
    Danford, Nicholas C.
    Saltzman, Bryan M.
    Constant, Michael
    Dantzker, Nicholas J.
    Trofa, David P.
    SICOT-J, 2021, 7
  • [10] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Is Not as Responsive as Legacy Scores in Detecting Patient Outcomes in Hip Preservation: A Systematic Review
    Jan, Kyleen
    Krivicich, Laura
    Hevesi, Mario
    Nho, Shane
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 39 (03) : 838 - 850