Attentional capture by size singletons is determined by top-down search goals

被引:36
|
作者
Kiss, Monika [1 ]
Eimer, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Dept Psychol, Birkbeck Coll, London WC1E 7HX, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Visual selection; Top-down control; Event-related potentials (ERPs); N2pc; VISUAL-SEARCH; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; SELECTIVITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01145.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The question whether attentional capture by salient visual stimuli is driven by bottom-up salience or is contingent on top-down task set is still under dispute. We show that the ability of size singletons to capture attention is determined by current search goals. Participants searched for small or large target singletons among medium-size distractors. Attentional capture by small or large size singleton cues that preceded target search displays was reflected by spatial cueing effects and N2pc components. These effects were observed only when these cues matched the current target-defining feature, but not for physically identical but mismatching cues. Results demonstrate that attentional capture by size singletons is not driven by bottom-up salience, but is controlled by feature-specific task settings.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 787
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Top-down instructions influence the attentional weight on color and shape dimensions during bidimensional search
    Xu, Zoe Jing
    Lleras, Alejandro
    Gong, Zixu Gavin
    Buetti, Simona
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [22] Automatic Selection of Irrelevant Object Features Through Working Memory Evidence for Top-Down Attentional Capture
    Soto, David
    Humphreys, Glyn W.
    EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 56 (03) : 165 - 172
  • [23] Contextual Cuing of Visual Search Does Not Guide Attention Automatically in the Presence of Top-Down Goals
    Luque, David
    Beesley, Tom
    Molinero, Sara
    Vadillo, Miguel A.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2021, 47 (08) : 1080 - 1090
  • [24] Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: Attentional capture or filtering costs?
    Becker, Stefanie I.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2007, 33 (04) : 764 - 787
  • [25] Exploring the breadth of the top-down representations that control attentional disengagement
    Wright, Timothy J.
    Boot, Walter R.
    Jones, John L.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 68 (05): : 993 - 1006
  • [26] Attentional effects of negative faces: Top-down contingent or involuntary?
    Gernot Horstmann
    Stefanie I. Becker
    Perception & Psychophysics, 2008, 70 : 1416 - 1434
  • [27] Prefrontal Top-Down Cortical Projection Controls Attentional Behavior
    Koike, Hiroyuki
    Norman, Kevin
    Lopez, Sarah
    Nabel, Elisa
    Flanigan, Meghan
    Garkun, Yury
    Dong, Zhe
    Demars, Michael
    Baxter, Mark
    Russo, Scott
    Morishita, Hirofumi
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 42 : S205 - S205
  • [28] Top-down inhibition of search distractors in parallel visual search
    Hermann J. Müller
    Adrian von Mühlenen
    Thomas Geyer
    Perception & Psychophysics, 2007, 69 : 1373 - 1388
  • [29] Redundancy gains in pop-out visual search are determined by top-down task set: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence
    Grubert, Anna
    Krummenacher, Joseph
    Eimer, Martin
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2011, 11 (14): : 1 - 10
  • [30] Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control
    Kadel, Hanna
    Feldmann-Wuestefeld, Tobias
    Schuboe, Anna
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 54 (05) : 736 - 754