Income, Policy, and Pollution

被引:4
作者
Hu, Hongtao [1 ]
Paudel, Krishna P. [2 ,3 ]
Tan, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Louisiana State Univ LSU, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[3] LSU Agr Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental pollution; Environmental protection policy; Environmental Kuznets curve; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; WATER-POLLUTION; SULFUR-DIOXIDE; HAVEN HYPOTHESIS; AIR-POLLUTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; CHINA; REGULATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-021-00621-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper identifies the roles of an environmental protection policy and income growth in enhancing environmental quality in China. In 2005, the Central Government of China piloted a policy that linked regional environmental quality to the performance assessment of local government officials in some provinces. After the implementation of the policy, pollution levels reduced substantially. However, many researchers believe that the improvement of China's environmental quality might have been due to an increase in per capita income, i.e., there is the presence of an "environmental Kuznets curve." We use a nonparametric IV model and a synthetic control method to identify the role of income and policy in improving environmental quality. Results show that after controlling for the mutual effects of the two factors, income level had an inverted U-shaped relationship with sulfur dioxide and wastewater emissions. There are differences in the effects of policies on pollution reduction among different cities, and the magnitude is affected by regional economic development. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the effects of income and policy on pollution reduction.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 153
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
[21]   Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions:: A robustness exercise [J].
Galeotti, M ;
Lanza, A ;
Pauli, F .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (01) :152-163
[22]   Environmental Regulations, Air and Water Pollution, and Infant Mortality in India [J].
Greenstone, Michael ;
Hanna, Rema .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (10) :3038-3072
[23]   ECONOMIC-GROWTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
GROSSMAN, GM ;
KRUEGER, AB .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (02) :353-377
[24]  
Haab T, 2017, ENV NATURAL RESOURCE
[25]  
HAHN RW, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P464
[26]   Environmental Kuznets Curve for sulfur: evidence using GMM estimation and random coefficient panel data models [J].
Halkos, GE .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2003, 8 :581-601
[27]   Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve [J].
Harbaugh, WT ;
Levinson, A ;
Wilson, DM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2002, 84 (03) :541-551
[28]   Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment:: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces [J].
He, Jie .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (01) :228-245
[29]  
Hoffmann R., 2005, J INT DEV, V17, P311, DOI DOI 10.1002/JID.1196
[30]   Applied Nonparametric Instrumental Variables Estimation [J].
Horowitz, Joel L. .
ECONOMETRICA, 2011, 79 (02) :347-394