Rubrics for Charge Conserving Current Mapping in Finite Element Electromagnetic Particle in Cell Methods

被引:9
作者
Crawford, Zane D. [1 ]
O'Connor, Scott [1 ]
Luginsland, John [2 ]
Shanker, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] US Air Force, AFRL, Off Sci Res, Arlington, VA 22201 USA
关键词
Mathematical models; Maxwell equations; Finite element analysis; Computational modeling; Plasmas; Media; Distribution functions; Charge conservation; finite element method; particle-in-cell (PIC) methods; EXTERIOR CALCULUS; GAUSS LAW; SIMULATION; FIELD; CONSERVATION; IMPLICIT; SCHEMES; GRIDS;
D O I
10.1109/TPS.2021.3122410
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Modeling of kinetic plasmas using electromagnetic particle in cell (EM-PIC) methods is a well worn problem, in that methods developed have been used extensively both understanding physics and exploiting them for device design. EM-PIC tools have largely relied on finite difference methods coupled with particle representations of the distribution function. Refinements to ensure consistency and charge conservation have largely been ad hoc efforts specific to finite difference methods. Meanwhile, solution methods for field solver have grown by leaps and bounds with significant performance metrics compared to finite difference methods. Developing new EM-PIC computational schemes that leverage modern field solver technology means re-examining analysis framework necessary for self-consistent EM-PIC solution. In this article, we prescribe general rubrics for charge conservation, demonstrate how these are satisfied in conventional finite difference PIC as well as finite element PIC, and prescribe a novel charge conserving finite element PIC. Our effort leverages proper mappings on to de-Rham sequences and lays a groundwork for understanding conditions that must be satisfied for consistency. Several numerical results demonstrate the applicability of these rubrics.
引用
收藏
页码:3719 / 3732
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Analysis and Numerics of Partial Differential Equations, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-88-470-2592-9_9
[2]   Contemporary particle-in-cell approach to laser-plasma modelling [J].
Arber, T. D. ;
Bennett, K. ;
Brady, C. S. ;
Lawrence-Douglas, A. ;
Ramsay, M. G. ;
Sircombe, N. J. ;
Gillies, P. ;
Evans, R. G. ;
Schmitz, H. ;
Bell, A. R. ;
Ridgers, C. P. .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2015, 57 (11)
[3]  
Arnold DN, 2006, ACT NUMERIC, V15, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0962492906210018
[4]   FINITE ELEMENT EXTERIOR CALCULUS FROM HODGE THEORY TO NUMERICAL STABILITY [J].
Arnold, Douglas N. ;
Falk, Richard S. ;
Winther, Ragnar .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 47 (02) :281-354
[5]  
Birdsall C.K., 2018, PLASMA PHYS COMPUT S
[6]  
BORIS J., 1970, P 4 C NUM SIM PLASM, V3
[7]   WHITNEY FORMS - A CLASS OF FINITE-ELEMENTS FOR 3-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTATIONS IN ELECTROMAGNETISM [J].
BOSSAVIT, A .
IEE PROCEEDINGS-A-SCIENCE MEASUREMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 135 (08) :493-500
[8]   Yee-like schemes on staggered cellular grids: A synthesis between FIT and FEM approaches [J].
Bossavit, A ;
Kettunen, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2000, 36 (04) :861-867
[9]   DISSIPATION OF CURRENTS IN IONIZED MEDIA [J].
BUNEMAN, O .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1959, 115 (03) :503-517
[10]  
Chakrabarti S., 2003, 18 INT C NUM SIM PLA