Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?

被引:6
|
作者
Dean, Abigail M. [1 ]
Oh, Jaehyun [1 ]
Thomson, Christopher J. [1 ]
Norris, Catherine J. [1 ]
Durgin, Frank H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swarthmore Coll, Dept Psychol, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA
来源
I-PERCEPTION | 2016年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
3D perception; slant perception; spatial cognition; individual differences; aging; SEX-DIFFERENCES; SURFACE ORIENTATION; MENTAL ROTATION; DISTANCE; SPACE; PERFORMANCE; BACKPACK; GLUCOSE; HILLS; SLOPE;
D O I
10.1177/2041669516658665
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Several individual differences including age have been suggested to affect the perception of slant. A cross-sectional study of outdoor hill estimation (N = 106) was analyzed using individual difference measures of age, experiential knowledge, fitness, personality traits, and sex. Of particular note, it was found that for participants who reported any experiential knowledge about slant, estimates decreased (i.e., became more accurate) as conscientiousness increased, suggesting that more conscientious individuals were more deliberate about taking their experiential knowledge (rather than perception) into account. Effects of fitness were limited to those without experiential knowledge, suggesting that they, too, may be cognitive rather than perceptual. The observed effects of age, which tended to produce lower, more accurate estimates of hill slant, provide more evidence that older adults do not see hills as steeper. The main effect of age was to lower slant estimates; such effects may be due to implicit experiential knowledge acquired over a lifetime. The results indicate the impact of cognitive, rather than perceptual factors on individual differences in slant estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Computerized Neurocognitive Battery: Validation, Aging Effects, and Heritability Across Cognitive Domains
    Swagerman, Suzanne C.
    de Geus, Eco J. C.
    Kan, Kees-Jan
    van Bergen, Elsje
    Nieuwboer, Harold A.
    Koenis, Marinka M. G.
    Pol, Hilleke E. Hulshoff
    Gur, Raquel E.
    Gur, Ruben C.
    Boomsma, Dorret I.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 30 (01) : 53 - 64
  • [22] Individual differences in the biphasic effects of ethanol
    Holdstock, L
    de Wit, H
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 22 (09) : 1903 - 1911
  • [23] Experiential, perceptual, and cognitive individual differences in the development of declarative and automatized phonological vocabulary knowledge
    Saito, Kazuya
    Uchihara, Takumi
    BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2024,
  • [24] The effects of aging in the hippocampus and cognitive decline
    Bettio, Luis E. B.
    Rajendran, Luckshi
    Gil-Mohapel, Joana
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2017, 79 : 66 - 86
  • [25] Biomarkers of Cognitive Training Effects in Aging
    Belleville, Sylvie
    Bherer, Louis
    CURRENT GERIATRICS REPORTS, 2012, 1 (02): : 104 - 110
  • [26] Biomarkers of Cognitive Training Effects in Aging
    Sylvie Belleville
    Louis Bherer
    Current Translational Geriatrics and Experimental Gerontology Reports, 2012, 1 (2): : 104 - 110
  • [27] Cognitive strategy in verbal fluency: sex differences, menstrual cycle, and menopause effects
    Cowell, Patricia E.
    Kamble, Meghana Wadnerkar
    Maitreyee, Ramya
    Varley, Rosemary A.
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2025,
  • [28] Individual differences in object-examining duration: do they reflect the use of different encoding strategies?
    Cassia, VM
    Simion, F
    COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 17 (02) : 1219 - 1234
  • [29] Individual differences and workload effects on strategy adoption in a dynamic task
    Moon, Jungaa
    Betts, Shawn
    Anderson, John R.
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2013, 144 (01) : 154 - 165
  • [30] Differential effects of white noise in cognitive and perceptual tasks
    Herweg, Nora. A.
    Bunzeck, Nico
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6