Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?

被引:6
|
作者
Dean, Abigail M. [1 ]
Oh, Jaehyun [1 ]
Thomson, Christopher J. [1 ]
Norris, Catherine J. [1 ]
Durgin, Frank H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swarthmore Coll, Dept Psychol, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA
来源
I-PERCEPTION | 2016年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
3D perception; slant perception; spatial cognition; individual differences; aging; SEX-DIFFERENCES; SURFACE ORIENTATION; MENTAL ROTATION; DISTANCE; SPACE; PERFORMANCE; BACKPACK; GLUCOSE; HILLS; SLOPE;
D O I
10.1177/2041669516658665
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Several individual differences including age have been suggested to affect the perception of slant. A cross-sectional study of outdoor hill estimation (N = 106) was analyzed using individual difference measures of age, experiential knowledge, fitness, personality traits, and sex. Of particular note, it was found that for participants who reported any experiential knowledge about slant, estimates decreased (i.e., became more accurate) as conscientiousness increased, suggesting that more conscientious individuals were more deliberate about taking their experiential knowledge (rather than perception) into account. Effects of fitness were limited to those without experiential knowledge, suggesting that they, too, may be cognitive rather than perceptual. The observed effects of age, which tended to produce lower, more accurate estimates of hill slant, provide more evidence that older adults do not see hills as steeper. The main effect of age was to lower slant estimates; such effects may be due to implicit experiential knowledge acquired over a lifetime. The results indicate the impact of cognitive, rather than perceptual factors on individual differences in slant estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Decision framing: Moderating effects of individual differences and cognitive processing
    Simon, AF
    Fagley, NS
    Halleran, JG
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2004, 17 (02) : 77 - 93
  • [12] The effects of video games on cognitive aging
    Maillot, Pauline
    Perrot, Alexandra
    Hartley, Alan
    GERIATRIE ET PSYCHOLOGIE NEUROPSYCHIATRIE DE VIEILLISSEMENT, 2012, 10 (01): : 83 - 94
  • [13] Matching effects on eating. Individual differences do make a difference!
    Brunner, Thomas A.
    APPETITE, 2012, 58 (02) : 429 - 431
  • [14] How do we get there? Effects of cognitive aging on route memory
    O'Malley, Mary
    Innes, Anthea
    Wiener, Jan M.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2018, 46 (02) : 274 - 284
  • [15] Task independence of placekeeping as a cognitive control construct: Evidence from individual differences and experimental effects
    Altmann, Erik M.
    Hambrick, David Z.
    COGNITION, 2022, 229
  • [16] What was I supposed to do? Effects of individual differences in age and anxiety on preschoolers' prospective memory
    Cheie, Lavinia
    Miclea, Mircea
    Visu-Petra, Laura
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 38 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [17] A Step Toward Precision Audiology: Individual Differences and Characteristic Profiles From Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Abilities
    Cherri, Dana
    Eddins, David A.
    Ozmeral, Erol J.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2024, 28
  • [18] Individual differences reveal similarities in serial dependence effects across perceptual tasks, but not to oculomotor tasks
    Guan, Shuchen
    Goettker, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2024, 24 (12):
  • [19] Role of dopamine and gray matter density in aging effects and individual differences of functional connectomes
    Garzon, Benjamin
    Lovden, Martin
    de Boer, Lieke
    Axelsson, Jan
    Riklund, Katrine
    Backman, Lars
    Nyberg, Lars
    Guitart-Masip, Marc
    BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION, 2021, 226 (03) : 743 - 758
  • [20] Role of dopamine and gray matter density in aging effects and individual differences of functional connectomes
    Benjamín Garzón
    Martin Lövdén
    Lieke de Boer
    Jan Axelsson
    Katrine Riklund
    Lars Bäckman
    Lars Nyberg
    Marc Guitart-Masip
    Brain Structure and Function, 2021, 226 : 743 - 758