Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from natural gas using current and emerging technologies

被引:292
作者
Salkuyeh, Yaser Khojasteh [1 ]
Saville, Bradley A. [1 ]
MacLean, Heather L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Chem Engn & Appl Chem, 200 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5S 3E5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Hydrogen production; Auto-thermal reforming; Steam methane reforming; Chemical looping; CHEMICAL-LOOPING COMBUSTION; PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION; COAL-GASIFICATION; FOSSIL-FUELS; CO2; CAPTURE; PSA; ENERGY; CARBON; POLYGENERATION; PURIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.219
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study presents techno-economic analyses and life cycle assessments of four hydrogen production technologies using natural gas as a feedstock. Steam methane reforming, auto thermal reforming and two innovative technologies: syngas chemical looping (SCL) and chemical looping reforming (CLR) are evaluated and compared. Thermodynamic analysis indicates that the CLR option can achieve the highest thermal efficiency (84%, LHV), even when CO2 capture and liquefaction units are added. The financial analysis shows that the minimum hydrogen selling price of this system is 50%-90% of the price for the other technologies and finally, a carbon price of only $5/tonne CO2 is required to make the CLR option (with zero direct carbon emissions) more financially attractive than SMR. While the analyses show that the CLR option is capable of achieving promising results there remain challenges to scale-up and commercialization of this technology including uniform flow distribution and reactivity of oxygen carrier. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18894 / 18909
页数:16
相关论文
共 85 条
[31]   The use of petroleum coke as fuel in a 10 kWth chemical-looping combustor [J].
Berquerand, Nicolas ;
Lyngfelt, Anders .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2008, 2 (02) :169-179
[32]  
Campbell CJ, 1998, SCI AM, V278, P77
[33]   Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods [J].
Cetinkaya, E. ;
Dincer, I. ;
Naterer, G. F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (03) :2071-2080
[34]   Applied thermodynamics for process modeling [J].
Chen, CC ;
Mathias, PM .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2002, 48 (02) :194-200
[35]   Three-reactors chemical looping process for hydrogen production [J].
Chiesa, Paolo ;
Lozza, Giovanni ;
Malandrino, Alberto ;
Romano, Matteo ;
Piccolo, Vincenzo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2008, 33 (09) :2233-2245
[36]   Technoeconomic analysis of a low CO2 emission dimethyl ether (DME) plant based on gasification of torrefied biomass [J].
Clausen, Lasse R. ;
Elmegaard, Brian ;
Houbak, Niels .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (12) :4831-4842
[37]   Life cycle assessment of processes for hydrogen production. Environmental feasibility and reduction of greenhouse gases emissions [J].
Dufour, J. ;
Serrano, D. P. ;
Galvez, J. L. ;
Moreno, J. ;
Garcia, C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (03) :1370-1376
[38]   TUBULAR REFORMING AND AUTOTHERMAL REFORMING OF NATURAL-GAS - AN OVERVIEW OF AVAILABLE PROCESSES [J].
DYBKJAER, I .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 42 (2-3) :85-107
[39]  
Elgowainy A., 2013, Updates to parameters of hydrogen production pathways in GREET™
[40]  
Fan L.-S., 2011, Chemical Looping Systems for Fossil Energy Conversions