Ticagrelor-based antiplatelet regimens in patients with atherosclerotic artery disease-A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

被引:4
|
作者
Cassese, Salvatore [1 ]
Ndrepepa, Gjin [1 ]
Byrne, Robert A. [1 ,2 ]
Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig [2 ,3 ]
Schunkert, Heribert [1 ,2 ]
Fusaro, Massimiliano [1 ]
Alfonso, Fernando [4 ]
Kastrati, Adnan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Deutsch Herzzentrum Munchen, Lazarettstr 36, Munich, Germany
[2] DZHK German Ctr Cardiovasc Res, Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, 1 Med Klin, Munich, Germany
[4] Hosp Univ La Princesa Madrid, Cardiac Dept, Madrid, Spain
关键词
MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; THERAPY; CLOPIDOGREL; ASPIRIN; INHIBITION; PREVENTION; OUTCOMES; STROKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2019.08.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Randomized trials did not consistently support superiority of ticagrelor, as monotherapy or in combination with aspirin, in terms of efficacy or safety, in patients with atherosclerotic artery disease. Methods Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and scientific session abstracts were searched for trials of patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease (with >1,000 participants and a follow-up >= 3 months) randomly assigned to ticagrelor-based or conventional antiplatelet therapies. Trial-level hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using a fixed- or random-effect model (in case of significant heterogeneity) with the inverse variance weighting. The primary outcome was alkause mortality. Other outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major bleeding. Results Overall 77,489 patients received either ticagrelor-based (n = 38,721) or conventional antiplatelet regimens (n = 38,768) in 6 trials. The primary outcome occurred in 4.5% of patients treated with experimental therapy and 4.9% of patients treated with control therapy (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-1.01; P = .07). Overall, patients treated with ticagrelor-based versus conventional antiplatelet regimens showed no significant difference in terms of all-cause death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding after 20 months. However, in trials of patients with coronary artery disease as primary diagnosis, the risk for all-cause death (HR = 0.84 [0.77-0.91], P < .001) and MI (HR = 0.87 [0.80-0.94], P = .007) was significantly reduced by experimental therapy. Conclusions In patients with atherosclerotic artery disease, the benefit of ticagrelor-based therapies was confined to patients treated for coronary artery disease. The drug significantly reduced the risk for all-cause death and MI without excess risk of bleeding in these patients. In consideration of limitations of subgroup analyses, these results need further validation.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 116
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel for coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with STEMI: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Yike
    Ye, Zixiang
    Guo, Ziyu
    Xie, Enmin
    Wang, Min
    Zhao, Xuecheng
    Liu, Mei
    Li, Peizhao
    Yu, Changan
    Gao, Yanxiang
    Zheng, Jingang
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [32] Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in East-Asian patients with acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Wu, Bin
    Lin, Houwen
    Tobe, Ruoyan Gai
    Zhang, Le
    He, Ben
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (03) : 281 - 291
  • [33] Comparison of safety and efficacy from ticagrelor as compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Syane, M.
    Wibowo, Y. A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2017, 19 (0E) : E22 - E22
  • [34] Umbrella review and meta-analysis of antiplatelet therapy for peripheral artery disease
    Ambler, G. K.
    Waldron, C. -A.
    Contractor, U. B.
    Hinchliffe, R. J.
    Twine, C. P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 (01) : 20 - 32
  • [35] Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
    Ray, Avik
    Najmi, Ahmad
    Khandelwal, Gaurav
    Jhaj, Ratinder
    Sadasivam, Balakrishnan
    CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2021, 35 (03) : 561 - 574
  • [36] Aspirin for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
    Berger, Jeffrey S.
    Krantz, Mori J.
    Kittelson, John M.
    Hiatt, William R.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 301 (18): : 1909 - 1919
  • [37] Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulation After Coronary Intervention: A Meta-analysis of 16 Clinical Trials and 9185 Patients
    Gao, Xiao-Fei
    Chen, Yan
    Fan, Zhong-Guo
    Jiang, Xiao-Min
    Wang, Zhi-Mei
    Li, Bing
    Mao, Wen-Xing
    Zhang, Jun-Jie
    Chen, Shao-Liang
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (08) : 499 - 509
  • [38] Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) in Elderly Patients: Which Drug to Choose, Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Akkaif, Mohammed Ahmed
    Sha'aban, Abubakar
    Daud, Nur Aizati Athirah
    Yunusa, Ismaeel
    Ng, Mei Li
    Kader, Muhamad Ali Sk Abdul
    Noor, Dzul Azri Mohamed
    Ibrahim, Baharudin
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2021, 8 (10)
  • [39] Combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy, component network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Szapary, Laszlo
    Tornyos, Daniel
    Kupo, Peter
    Lukacs, Reka
    El Abdallaoui, Oumaima El Alaoui
    Komocsi, Andras
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [40] Oral Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy for Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Tang, Tao
    Zhang, Ming
    Li, Wendong
    Hu, Nan
    Du, Xiaolong
    Ran, Feng
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2021, 27